Apollo Vs Captain Data : Comparaison

Derrick is purpose-built for teams operating within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms and CSV exports that Apollo requires. While Apollo excels at large contact databases and email verification, Derrick focuses on deep data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and real-time email validation for better deliverability. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and native Sheets integration make it ideal for teams prioritizing efficiency and cost-effectiveness over sheer database size, particularly those already relying on Google Sheets as their prospecting hub.

Derrick offers significantly lower entry costs for SMBs compared to Apollo. Derrick's Small plan starts at just $9 monthly with 4,000 credits and no credit card required for the free tier, while Apollo's pricing typically begins higher for comparable functionality. Derrick's rollover credits mean unused monthly allowances don't expire, providing better budget flexibility. Additionally, Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving SMBs approximately $1,200 annually compared to Apollo's ecosystem, making it substantially more cost-effective for resource-constrained teams managing prospecting directly within Google Sheets.

When it comes to data quality, Apollo emphasizes breadth and real-time contact verification across a vast database, delivering strong accuracy for outbound prospecting but sometimes showing variability in niche industries or incomplete enrichment for deeper company intelligence. Captain Data excels at LinkedIn-driven prospecting with solid enrichment of emails, phones, and social profiles, yet its depth beyond LinkedIn data can be limited and batch processing for large volumes can lag. Derrick stands out for 100% native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-assisted scoring and segmentation, all without exporting to CSV or requiring a LinkedIn dependency, which can yield more consistent, actionable records and smoother automation for ongoing workflows.

Not entirely. While Apollo and Captain Data offer valuable features, they serve different primary functions and lack Derrick's integrated approach. Apollo excels at contact database scale but requires external tools for enrichment, while Captain Data focuses on LinkedIn scraping with limited firmographic depth. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and manual workflows while providing 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI for scoring and segmentation. For teams already working in Sheets seeking comprehensive enrichment without platform switching, Derrick delivers efficiency gains both alternatives cannot match. Neither Apollo nor Captain Data replaces Derrick's specific value proposition around native spreadsheet integration and cost-effective monthly rolling credits.

Derrick differs from Apollo and Captain Data in core architecture, data approach, and workflow depth. Derrick is 100% native Google Sheets, transforming them into a full prospecting hub without CSV exports or complex setup, and it includes real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation (Claude and ChatGPT), plus 3000+ Zapier/Make/n8n integrations. While Apollo emphasizes a vast contact database, real-time verification, and outbound workflows, it can struggle with granular enrichment and niche industries. Captain Data excels at LinkedIn-based scraping and automation but may lack deep, multi-source enrichment and advanced data validation. Derrick uniquely combines native sheet-based workflows, rich enrichment (50+ attributes per contact), durable credit rollover, and no-credit-card required free tier, offering a cost-efficient, scalable alternative for teams prioritizing seamless Google Sheets integration and automated insights alongside robust data quality.