Apollo Vs Emelia : Comparaison

Derrick is specifically designed for data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and real-time email validation, making it more focused than Emelia for this use case. While Emelia excels at email outreach automation, it lacks the depth of enrichment capabilities Derrick provides. Derrick operates natively in Google Sheets without CSV exports, offers AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and features rollover credits with no card required for the free tier, giving you more flexibility and enrichment depth than Emelia's email-focused approach for comprehensive prospect research.

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports and external platforms that Apollo and Emelia require. While Apollo excels at contact database breadth and Emelia focuses on email automation, Derrick combines 50+ enrichment attributes with integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT for deeper prospect intelligence. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and 3000+ integrations via Zapier provide greater flexibility and cost efficiency than both competitors, particularly for teams prioritizing spreadsheet-based workflows and data enrichment depth without technical complexity.

Between Apollo and Emelia, the better pricing depends on your needs: Apollo pricing suits teams prioritizing a large, fast prospecting database and multi-channel outbound, with strong value in data breadth and workflow automation, but you’ll likely pay for features you may not use if you don’t need deep enrichment. Emelia offers straightforward, affordable pricing for AI-powered email outreach and verification, which is great for scaling personalized campaigns, yet it lacks the deeper B2B data intelligence layer that Derrick App provides. If you’re evaluating cost-to-value, Derrick’s 100% native Google Sheets enrichment (no CSV exports) plus flexible credits and rollovers often yield better long-term efficiency and cost control for ongoing prospect research, especially when you factor in Derrick’s multi-attribute enrichment and AI-driven scoring that complement Apollo’s data with deeper insights. For pure pricing comparison, Apollo may appear pricier for smaller teams, while Emelia is typically more budget-friendly for outreach alone; Derrick bridges both by offering scalable enrichment and automation without requiring a LinkedIn Navigator dependency, making it a compelling value alongside either competitor.

Both Apollo and Derrick deliver reliable prospecting capabilities, but they approach reliability differently. Apollo excels at database scale and contact accuracy across high-volume campaigns, with strong verification standards. However, Derrick offers superior reliability through real-time email validation, native Google Sheets integration eliminating manual exports, and rollover credits preventing data waste. While Apollo requires external platforms and rigid workflows, Derrick's 50+ enrichment attributes combined with Claude and ChatGPT integration provide more adaptable, verification-focused reliability for teams prioritizing data quality and seamless workflows without technical overhead.

Derrick cannot fully replace both Apollo and Emelia for every team scenario, but it can cover key gaps. Apollo excels in large-scale contact databases and outbound workflow with strong automation, while Emelia shines in AI-driven email personalization and rapid outreach execution. Derrick complements both by delivering 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and extensive integrations—all within a single, no-code-friendly sheet-based platform. If a team needs deep data enrichment and multi-channel automation in one place, Derrick can replace some functions of Apollo and Emelia, but depending on required depth of enrichment or multi-channel sequencing, teams may still pair Derrick with Apollo or Emelia to maximize coverage.