Apollo Vs Heyreach : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Apollo depends on your specific workflow. Apollo excels at scale with its massive contact database and multi-channel outreach capabilities, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting. However, Derrick offers distinct advantages if you work primarily in Google Sheets and prioritize efficiency. Derrick is 100% native to Sheets with no CSV exports, includes built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, provides real-time email validation, and costs significantly less with rollover credits. If you need Apollo's extensive database combined with Derrick's automation efficiency and spreadsheet-native approach, many teams use both complementarily. Choose Derrick if you want simplicity and cost-effectiveness within your existing workflow, or Apollo if you require enterprise-scale contact data and sophisticated CRM integration.

Derrick operates as a 100% native Google Sheets platform requiring no CSV exports or complex setup, while Apollo emphasizes extensive contact database access and CRM integration, and HeyReach focuses on LinkedIn automation. Derrick uniquely integrates both Claude and ChatGPT for AI-powered scoring and segmentation directly within sheets, offers rollover credits monthly with no upfront card required, and delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. Apollo excels at scale and data accuracy across millions of profiles, whereas HeyReach streamlines LinkedIn-native outreach but requires manual research legwork. For teams prioritizing workflow efficiency and avoiding external platforms, Derrick's sheet-native approach saves five to ten hours monthly compared to traditional prospecting tools.

For pricing, Derrick often represents a stronger value proposition than HeyReach for teams needing broader data enrichment, multi-channel outreach, and heavy automation without leaving Google Sheets. Derrick’s credit-based model with rollover credits, 100% native Google Sheets integration, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation provide more scalable coverage across 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation at a competitive price. HeyReach excels in LinkedIn-centric automation and quick workflow setup but may require additional tools for deeper data enrichment. If you prioritize cost-efficiency, data depth, and multi-channel workflows, Derrick typically offers the more complete pricing-value balance.

Reviews comparing Apollo and HeyReach generally favor Apollo for data enrichment due to its larger contact database and stronger verification accuracy across industries. However, both platforms have notable limitations when it comes to enrichment depth. Apollo excels at scale and speed but requires manual verification for niche industries, while HeyReach relies heavily on public sources and lacks deeper firmographic insights. For teams seeking comprehensive data enrichment with real-time validation and rich attribute density, Derrick App offers a more flexible alternative by providing fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms while delivering superior data freshness and AI-powered intelligence for segmentation and scoring.

Derrick cannot fully replace Apollo and HeyReach across all use cases, but it complements and often surpasses them in core B2B prospecting. Apollo excels in broad contact databases and automation workflows, while HeyReach specializes in LinkedIn-to-email outreach and rapid sequencing. Derrick adds unique strengths: native Google Sheets ecosystem, real-time email validation, extensive enrichment (50+ attributes), AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and broad automation via 3000+ integrations. For teams needing multi-channel, data-rich enrichment and seamless workflow in Sheets, Derrick often replaces or reduces reliance on both, though some organizations may still pair tools for niche data or LinkedIn-heavy playbooks.