Apollo Vs Kaspr : Comparaison

Derrick offers a more streamlined approach for LinkedIn lead enrichment compared to Kaspr. While Kaspr excels at phone verification, it requires manual validation and lacks comprehensive company intelligence. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator or external platforms. With real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and rollover credits, Derrick delivers deeper prospect insights at lower total cost, making it ideal for teams seeking efficient, multi-dimensional lead enrichment without complexity.

Derrick, Apollo, and Kaspr each serve distinct prospecting needs. Apollo excels with its massive 250-million-contact database and integrated CRM workflows, ideal for high-volume outbound teams. Kaspr specializes in LinkedIn-native phone verification with seamless calling features. Derrick stands out as the only 100% native Google Sheets solution, eliminating CSV exports and complex integrations while offering AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, rollover credits, and no credit card required for free access. Choose based on your workflow: Apollo for scale, Kaspr for phone-first prospecting, or Derrick for spreadsheet-native efficiency and flexibility.

When comparing pricing between Derrick and Kaspr, Derrick generally offers more flexibility and value for teams that rely on Google Sheets and need rich enrichment without needing extra software. Derrick’s pricing is credit-based with a free tier and monthly rollover, plus the ability to scale from Small to XL credits, making it easy to align spend with usage. Kaspr uses a credit-based model for contact verification and outreach, but users often need supplementary tools for deeper enrichment. If your priority is cost efficiency at scale and seamless integration into Sheets, Derrick tends to provide better overall pricing value.

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or external platforms that Apollo and Kaspr require. While Apollo excels at contact database scale with 250+ million records, Derrick differentiates through integrated AI powered by Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation directly in your spreadsheet. Kaspr focuses on LinkedIn-based phone verification, whereas Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than both competitors for variable outreach workflows.

Derrick cannot fully replace both Apollo and Kaspr in every workflow, but it can cover many of their core needs depending on your priorities. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment platform with real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and broad integration via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without LinkedIn dependencies. Apollo provides a massive, validated contact database, multi-channel outreach, and CRM workflow automation, while Kaspr emphasizes real-time phone/email verification and LinkedIn-centric prospecting. If your team prioritizes data enrichment depth, multi-channel outreach, or LinkedIn-based sourcing, you may still rely on Apollo or Kaspr for those areas. Derrick can replace or significantly streamline parts of the workflow by handling enrichment, scoring, and automation directly inside Sheets, and its flexible pricing, credits carryover, and no-credit-card-free tier add cost-efficiency. For best results, many teams use Derrick in conjunction with Apollo and/or Kaspr to fill gaps in data breadth, validation, or channel coverage.