Apollo Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick can effectively replace Apollo for outreach automation, though they serve slightly different purposes. Apollo excels at contact database access and multi-channel outreach at scale, while Derrick provides deeper data enrichment directly within Google Sheets with AI-powered scoring and segmentation using Claude and ChatGPT. If your team prioritizes seamless workflow integration without CSV exports and values rollover credits with no upfront investment, Derrick offers a more flexible alternative. However, if you need Apollo's extensive 250 million contact database, combining both tools often delivers optimal results for comprehensive prospecting strategies.

Derrick operates on a transparent, flexible credit-based model starting at zero dollars with 200 free credits and no credit card required, scaling to $175 for 100,000 credits. Skrapp uses traditional monthly subscription pricing with fixed tiers that don't roll over unused credits, meaning you lose access to unused portions each month. Derrick's rollover credits and lower entry barrier make it more cost-effective for teams with fluctuating prospecting volumes, while Skrapp's rigid monthly structure works best for consistent, predictable usage patterns.

Derrick offers more features for teams when compared to Skrapp, primarily because Derrick is a full-fledged B2B data enrichment and prospecting platform deeply integrated with Google Sheets. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, built-in AI scoring and segmentation with Claude and ChatGPT, and access to 3000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without leaving Sheets. Skrapp excels at fast email discovery and LinkedIn-based collection, but it lacks the deep company enrichment, intent signals, and automation depth that Derrick offers. For teams seeking a comprehensive, extensible and AI-assisted prospecting workflow within a familiar spreadsheet environment, Derrick delivers more features and flexibility than Skrapp.

Derrick offers significantly more flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, meaning unused credits carry forward to the next period, whereas Apollo requires consistent monthly spending without carryover. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, while Apollo's entry pricing is higher with less transparency. Derrick's Small plan at 9€ per month with 4000 credits delivers exceptional value compared to Apollo's enterprise-focused pricing structure. For budget-conscious teams or those with variable prospecting volumes, Derrick's rollover credit system and lower entry costs make it the more economical choice, particularly when factoring in integration savings by eliminating the need for separate LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions.

Derrick and Skrapp differ mainly in scope and integration model. Skrapp excels at fast, browser-based lead discovery with strong email verification and a simple LinkedIn-to-prospect workflow, making it great for quick, volume-driven outreach. Derrick, by contrast, offers a broader B2B data enrichment suite fully native to Google Sheets, plus AI-powered scoring, segmentation, and summaries, plus 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and extensive integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. If you need rapid, single-source contact discovery, Skrapp is solid; if you want deep enrichment, AI-driven automation, and a seamless Google Sheets-based pipeline (with credits that roll over and no credit card for the free tier), Derrick provides more long-term value and workflow flexibility.