Apollo Vs Snov.Io : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is a solid alternative to Apollo, particularly if your team prioritizes efficiency and cost savings. While Apollo excels at database scale with 250 million contacts, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex integrations that consume 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, whereas Apollo focuses primarily on contact discovery. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility than Apollo's traditional licensing model. Both serve different workflows: Apollo for high-volume prospecting at scale, Derrick for lean teams seeking streamlined, in-sheet enrichment without platform switching.

Derrick wins on integration simplicity by operating entirely within Google Sheets, eliminating time-consuming CSV exports that Apollo and Snov.io require. While Apollo excels at contact database breadth and Snov.io at email verification affordability, Derrick combines 50+ enrichment attributes with native AI capabilities using both Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Derrick's rollover credits and no-credit-card free tier provide superior flexibility compared to competitors' rigid monthly allocations, making it ideal for teams prioritizing efficiency and ease of use without complex setup requirements.

When comparing pricing, Derrick often presents a more cost-efficient and flexible model for many B2B teams. Derrick’s free tier offers 200 credits with no credit card required, and its paid plans—ranging from Small to XL—are designed around credit bundles that can be rolled over monthly, which can reduce waste for teams with fluctuating prospecting needs. Snov.io, by contrast, adopts a more usage-based pricing structure focused on email discovery and verification, which can scale up costs quickly for large volumes. If your priority is a native Google Sheets workflow with extensive enrichment at a predictable, credit-based price, Derrick tends to offer better value. However, for teams prioritizing straightforward email finding and verification on a tighter budget, Snov.io remains a strong affordable option.

Snov.io and Apollo both excel at email discovery and verification, but they approach outreach differently. Apollo offers a broader sales intelligence platform with 250+ million contacts and integrated CRM capabilities, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting at scale. Snov.io focuses specifically on affordable email finding and verification, excelling for lean teams prioritizing cost-efficiency. However, both platforms require external tools for deeper enrichment and complex workflows. Derrick complements either solution by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports while providing 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring—all without leaving your spreadsheet, saving teams significant time and reducing tool sprawl.

Yes, Derrick can be a strong replacement for both Apollo and Snov.io in many B2B prospecting workflows, but with caveats. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and broad automation through 3000+ integrations, all without CSV exports or LinkedIn Navigator. While Apollo offers a vast database and multi-channel outreach and Snov.io excels at fast email discovery, Derrick combines data enrichment, onboard AI insights, and cost-efficient credits to streamline prospecting end-to-end. For teams prioritizing in-sheet workflows and flexibility, Derrick often serves as a comprehensive replacement, especially when data intensity and automation matter most.