Apollo Vs Texau : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to TexAu, particularly if you're looking for comprehensive B2B data enrichment rather than just text automation. While TexAu excels at text processing, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets and enriches contact and company data with 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick eliminates the need for external platforms, CSV exports, and complex setup workflows, saving teams 5-10 hours monthly. Unlike TexAu's limited customization, Derrick offers flexible credit rollover, no credit card requirement for free tier access, and seamless integration with 3000+ tools via Zapier and Make, making it better suited for teams requiring deeper prospect intelligence and streamlined prospecting workflows within their existing spreadsheet environment.

The best choice depends on your specific needs. Apollo excels at large-scale contact databases with 250+ million verified profiles, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting teams. TexAu focuses on text automation and content processing rather than B2B intelligence. Derrick stands out for teams already using Google Sheets, offering 100% native integration without CSV exports, AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits starting at just 9€ monthly. If you prioritize seamless workflow integration and cost efficiency, Derrick eliminates the need for multiple tools while Apollo suits enterprises requiring massive contact databases.

Is Apollo pricing better than TexAu for SMBs? Not directly comparable, as Apollo targets comprehensive B2B prospecting with millions of contacts and CRM workflows, often at a higher total cost for teams needing deep data and multi-channel outreach. TexAu focuses on automated writing and text augmentation with a simpler, more affordable setup ideal for content workflows. For SMBs, Apollo may deliver faster pipeline generation but at a bigger investment, while TexAu offers cost-effective automation for writing tasks. Derrick App can complement either by adding native Google Sheets enrichment, AI scoring, and seamless integrations, potentially delivering a lower overall cost of ownership and stronger data accuracy without complex exports or additional tools.

Derrick operates as a fully native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex external configurations that Apollo requires. Unlike Apollo's database-centric approach, Derrick combines 50+ enrichment attributes with integrated AI powered by both Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits system and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than Apollo's traditional pricing model, making it ideal for teams prioritizing seamless workflow integration and cost efficiency.

TexAu and Derrick approach automation from different angles. TexAu excels at automated text processing, data augmentation, and batch workflow tasks with a straightforward, low-friction interface. It shines for scalable writing and content-related automation, but its scope is more narrow and tooling-focused than full-scale prospecting automation. Derrick, by contrast, is a 100% native Google Sheets platform designed to automate B2B enrichment and outreach directly inside Sheets, with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and broad integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. If you need end-to-end prospecting automation and multi-channel workflow in a single environment, Derrick offers deeper automation capabilities and a more integrated data enrichment stack, while TexAu is a strong companion for specialized text augmentation tasks within broader processes. For teams evaluating both, TexAu is best as a writing-automation layer, whereas Derrick provides comprehensive, native automation and enrichment for scalable B2B outreach.