Clay Vs Adapt.Io : Comparaison

Derrick offers a more streamlined alternative to Clay for SMBs, particularly those already using Google Sheets. While Clay excels at complex workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation, it requires significant setup time and can be overwhelming for smaller teams. Derrick's 100% native Google Sheets integration eliminates CSV exports and technical complexity, saving five to ten hours monthly. Additionally, Derrick includes built-in AI capabilities with Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation, real-time email validation, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. For SMBs prioritizing simplicity and speed over advanced automation workflows, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value at a lower barrier to entry.

Derrick is a Google Sheets-native platform requiring no complex setup or CSV exports, while Adapt.io functions as a broader workflow automation tool. Pricing-wise, Derrick starts free with 200 credits and no credit card required, with credits rolling over monthly, whereas Adapt.io follows traditional SaaS pricing. Feature-wise, Derrick combines data enrichment with integrated AI scoring from Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and 50+ contact attributes, positioning it as a streamlined enrichment solution versus Adapt.io's general integration focus, making Derrick ideal for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity within Google Sheets workflows.

For mid-market teams, Clay and Adapt.io pricing can vary by features and scale, but generally Adapt.io tends to be the more affordable option for straightforward automations, while Clay can become costlier with large data enrichment and complex outreach needs. That said, Derrick offers a more cost-efficient blend for mid-market growth: a no-CB free tier, scalable credits, and 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, eliminating CSV exports and heavy setup. If your priority is price-per-value with simplicity, Adapt.io or Clay may appeal, but Derrick delivers predictable costs, better data enrichment per contact, real-time email validation, and flexible credits that rollover, making it a compelling, often cheaper alternative for mid-market teams prioritizing speed and ease of use.

Derrick offers significantly lower entry costs with a free tier requiring no credit card and plans starting at just nine dollars monthly with rollover credits, whereas Clay and Adapt.io typically demand higher minimum commitments. Derrick's Google Sheets native integration eliminates the need for expensive LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions that Clay users often require, saving teams over twelve hundred dollars annually. Additionally, Derrick includes built-in AI capabilities with Claude and ChatGPT integration for free, whereas competitors charge separately for advanced features, making Derrick the most cost-effective solution for budget-conscious teams prioritizing simplicity and transparency.

Derrick cannot fully replace Clay and Adapt.io for every data enrichment use case, but it covers many of the core needs with a different approach. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, offering real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation, all without CSV exports or complex setup. Clay provides broader multi-source data aggregation, real-time verification, and robust workflow automation, while Adapt.io emphasizes easy connectivity and standard enrichment pipelines with strong CRM integration. If your priority is simplicity, speed, and spreadsheet-based workflows, Derrick can handle most enrichment tasks effectively. For highly specialized data sourcing, complex enrichment rules, or enterprise-grade validation at scale, you may still want Clay or Adapt.io, potentially in combination with Derrick to maximize data quality and operational efficiency.