Compare Clay vs Captain Data side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.
Discover Derrick App
Start enriching thousands of leads directly in Google Sheets. No complexsetup, no learning curve.
Try it for free →.png)
| Clay | Derrick App | Captain Data | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 399$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Clay offers real-time data enrichment with flexible pricing tiers, starting at an entry-level plan and scalable credits for outbound workflows—details are on the pricing page. See full pricing breakdown for all plans and credits.
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Just faster enrichment, cleaner data, and better outcomes for most teams.
Captain Data offers accessible entry pricing with a free tier and scalable paid plans to accommodate growing data needs—details are available on the pricing page with a full breakdown of features and limits. See the complete pricing details for all plans and usage allowances.
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
.jpg)
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io, Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better Interface since It's google sheets. Snov.io does have more flexibility with extra options, but a lot of those I don't even use since they are not flesh out. We will see how this performs over time."
.jpg)
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer. Go for it!"
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button. Best thing is that the tool can be used inside of google sheets."
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!."
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what it best is the efficiency it delivers results with. It is very stable and rarely gives you wrong data."
.jpg)
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo isincredibly powerful. I can build a completeprospect list with contact info in under an hour.Absolute must-have for outbound."
.svg)
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all.Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
Opportunity Prospector
Derrick and Clay both prioritize speed and simplicity, but take different approaches. Clay excels at workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation, making it powerful for complex prospecting sequences, though it requires significant setup time and technical configuration. Derrick, by contrast, operates natively within Google Sheets with zero external setup, enabling you to enrich contacts and companies directly without CSV exports or complex integrations. For teams valuing pure simplicity and immediate productivity, Derrick's native Google Sheets environment eliminates onboarding friction entirely. Clay suits organizations willing to invest setup time for advanced automation, while Derrick delivers faster time-to-value with minimal learning curve and rollover credits for flexible usage.
Yes, Derrick is a solid alternative to Clay for data enrichment, particularly if you prioritize simplicity and speed over complex workflow automation. While Clay excels at multi-step prospecting sequences and requires significant setup time, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets with zero configuration needed, saving teams five to ten hours monthly. Derrick enriches contacts with fifty plus attributes and includes real-time email validation for better deliverability. Unlike Clay's rate-limiting challenges, Derrick offers rollover credits monthly and requires no credit card for the free tier, making it more accessible for teams seeking straightforward, efficient data enrichment without technical overhead.
Derrick and Captain Data both offer automation, but with different strengths. Captain Data excels at LinkedIn-based prospecting and multi-channel enrichment, particularly for teams focused on social selling. However, Derrick provides superior automation directly within Google Sheets without external platforms or CSV exports, saving teams 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick's integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT enables advanced scoring and segmentation automation that Captain Data lacks. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility for teams with variable automation needs, making it the more streamlined choice for comprehensive automation workflows.
The main difference is how they approach data enrichment and workflow design. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, turning Sheets into a complete prospecting hub with zero complex setup, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and extensive integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. Clay focuses on real-time data enrichment and outbound automation across multiple data sources, but can require more initial configuration and ongoing data quality checks. Captain Data emphasizes LinkedIn-based prospecting and scrapes for quick, user-friendly data collection, with less depth in general data enrichment. Derrick stands out for simplicity, cost-controlled credits, and seamless Google Sheets-centric workflows that reduce manual tasks and onboarding friction.
Both Clay and Captain Data handle pricing differently based on their core strengths. Clay uses a usage-based model tied to data enrichment volume and workflow complexity, which can scale unpredictably for high-volume campaigns. Captain Data charges based on the number of prospects you extract and enrich, making costs harder to forecast when scaling LinkedIn-based prospecting. Derrick offers a more transparent, predictable pricing structure with rollover credits, no credit card required for the free tier, and flexible plans starting at nine dollars monthly. This approach eliminates surprise overages and gives teams better budget control, especially when prospecting needs fluctuate month to month.
Derrick cannot replace both Clay and Captain Data in a one-to-one sense, but it can cover many essential aspects of both depending on your needs. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and outreach hub, offering real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring, and broad integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without complex setup. Clay shines with multi-source real-time data enrichment and automated outreach workflows, though it requires more configuration and can face data freshness and rate-limit challenges. Captain Data focuses on LinkedIn-driven prospecting and straightforward web scraping with ease of use, but its depth of enrichment and customization lags behind specialized tools. If your priority is a simple, fast, spreadsheet-centric workflow with strong enrichment and automation inside Sheets, Derrick can replace many of the routine tasks Clay or Captain Data handle. However, for highly specialized data enrichment, niche industry coverage, or LinkedIn-centric multi-channel enrichment at scale, you may still benefit from integrating Clay and Captain Data alongside Derrick to maximize data depth, accuracy, and reach.
.svg)
