Clay Vs Derrick App: Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Clay, especially if you prioritize simplicity and speed over complexity. While Clay excels at aggregating multiple data sources, it requires significant setup time and can overwhelm non-technical teams. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex configurations, saving five to ten hours monthly. Both platforms offer strong email validation and data enrichment, but Derrick's integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT enables automated lead scoring and segmentation directly in your spreadsheet. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier make it more flexible for teams with variable prospecting volumes. For organizations seeking streamlined, accessible enrichment without technical overhead, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value.

Clay's pricing model operates on a credit-based system similar to Derrick, but with key differences in flexibility and value. Clay charges per enrichment action across its data sources, while Derrick offers more affordable entry points starting at zero dollars with two hundred credits and no credit card required. Derrick's credits roll over monthly, so unused credits don't disappear, giving you better budget control. For teams already using Google Sheets, Derrick eliminates expensive third-party tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, potentially saving over a thousand euros annually while delivering comparable enrichment depth with integrated AI capabilities for scoring and segmentation.

Derrick cannot be a direct one-to-one replacement for Clay for LinkedIn prospecting, but it can cover the core needs more simply and cost-effectively. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, eliminating complex setup and CSV exports, and it offers real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, plus AI-driven scoring and segmentation. While Clay provides robust data enrichment from multiple sources and built-in outbound automation, Derrick emphasizes speed, ease of use, and budget flexibility with monthly rollovers and a free tier. For teams prioritizing simplicity, speed, and Google Sheets-centric workflows, Derrick can replace Clay for LinkedIn prospecting workflows, though users should validate data depth and multi-source enrichment needs on a case-by-case basis.

For small teams, Derrick offers a streamlined advantage over Clay. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating complex setup and CSV exports, which saves five to ten hours monthly. It includes real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. Clay excels at high-volume prospecting but demands more technical expertise and workflow configuration. For resource-constrained teams prioritizing speed and simplicity, Derrick's direct-in-spreadsheet approach delivers faster time-to-value with lower friction.

Clay’s main features center on real-time data enrichment and outbound automation. It pulls data from multiple sources (web scraping, API integrations, and third-party databases) into one interface, offers a visual no-code workflow builder for multi-step prospecting sequences, and provides strong email validation and company intelligence. Its native integrations with sales tools like HubSpot and Salesforce help deploy lists quickly. The key advantages include speed in building targeted lists, flexible data sourcing, and transparent data provenance. For those prioritizing simplicity and speed, Derrick offers a more streamlined alternative with 100% native Google Sheets, no complex setup, and credits that roll over, making it easier to start and scale without heavy configuration.