Compare Clay vs Expandi side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.
Discover Derrick App
Start enriching thousands of leads directly in Google Sheets. No complexsetup, no learning curve.
Try it for free →.png)
| Clay | Derrick App | Expandi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 99$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Clay offers real-time data enrichment with flexible outbound automation, starting from an entry-level tier and scalable paid plans; for exact prices and limits, see the full pricing breakdown on the Pricing Clay page.
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Just faster enrichment, cleaner data, and better outcomes for most teams.
Expandi offers a free tier with limited credits and paid plans starting at competitive monthly rates; for exact pricing by plan and usage, see the full pricing breakdown on the dedicated page. View complete pricing details now.
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
.jpg)
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io, Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better Interface since It's google sheets. Snov.io does have more flexibility with extra options, but a lot of those I don't even use since they are not flesh out. We will see how this performs over time."
.jpg)
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer. Go for it!"
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button. Best thing is that the tool can be used inside of google sheets."
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!."
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what it best is the efficiency it delivers results with. It is very stable and rarely gives you wrong data."
.jpg)
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo isincredibly powerful. I can build a completeprospect list with contact info in under an hour.Absolute must-have for outbound."
.svg)
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all.Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
Opportunity Prospector
Derrick and Clay take different approaches to data enrichment. Clay excels at aggregating data from 50+ sources through API integrations and offers sophisticated workflow automation, making it ideal for teams building complex prospecting sequences. However, Clay requires significant setup time, demands technical expertise for advanced configurations, and depends heavily on third-party data sources that can vary in accuracy. Derrick, by contrast, operates natively within Google Sheets with no external platform needed, delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation. Derrick's integrated AI capabilities using Claude and ChatGPT enable automatic scoring and segmentation without manual configuration, while rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility. For teams prioritizing simplicity, speed, and direct Sheets-based workflows, Derrick streamlines the entire enrichment process without the learning curve Clay demands.
Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Clay depends on your priorities. Clay excels at complex workflow automation and aggregating data from multiple sources, making it ideal for teams running high-volume campaigns requiring sophisticated custom sequences. However, Derrick offers a more streamlined approach by operating entirely within Google Sheets, eliminating setup complexity and CSV exports. Derrick's real-time email validation, integrated AI capabilities with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits provide better flexibility for teams seeking simplicity and cost efficiency. If you prioritize speed and ease of use over advanced automation workflows, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value without the learning curve Clay demands.
Derrick offers more transparent and flexible pricing compared to Clay. Clay operates on a usage-based model with variable costs depending on data sources and API integrations, often requiring significant investment for teams running high-volume campaigns. Derrick provides fixed-tier pricing starting at zero dollars for 200 credits with no credit card required, plus rollover credits monthly. This means you only pay for what you use, with predictable costs and no surprise charges, making budget forecasting simpler for growing B2B teams.
Derrick vs Expandi for LinkedIn outreach: Expandi excels at LinkedIn-specific automation—connection requests, follow-ups, and campaign analytics within the LinkedIn ecosystem—delivering quick setup and strong ease of use for high-volume, LinkedIn-focused outreach. Derrick, however, complements Expandi by providing 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, multi-channel prospecting capabilities, and real-time email validation, plus 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and AI-driven scoring. For LinkedIn-only campaigns, Expandi is a solid choice; for broader outreach and data reliability beyond LinkedIn, Derrick adds depth with flexible integrations, transferable credits, and robust data quality, making it the more versatile option when you need multi-source prospecting alongside LinkedIn efforts.
Derrick prioritizes simplification through its native Google Sheets integration, eliminating complex setup and CSV exports that Clay and Expandi require. While Clay excels at workflow automation and Expandi at LinkedIn-specific outreach, both demand significant configuration time and technical knowledge. Derrick streamlines the entire process by keeping your data in Sheets with built-in AI enrichment, real-time email validation, and 50+ attributes per contact, requiring zero learning curve. For teams valuing speed and ease of use over advanced automation complexity, Derrick delivers maximum simplification with rollover credits and no upfront payment required.
Clay cannot fully replace Expandi for multi-channel prospecting. Clay excels at data enrichment and outbound automation across multiple data sources and channels, offering real-time verification and robust integrations, but it is not a LinkedIn-native outreach platform and requires more setup for multi-channel sequences. Expandi, by contrast, specializes in LinkedIn automation with intuitive sequences, warm-up features, and native LinkedIn workflow integration. Derrick complements both by providing 100% native Google Sheets prospecting, real-time email validation, AI scoring, and broad integration options, delivering a simpler, faster path to multi-channel prospecting without heavy configuration. If your priority is LinkedIn-centric multi-channel outreach, Expandi is stronger; for data richness and automation breadth, Clay shines, while Derrick offers a streamlined, sheet-native alternative with strong verification and AI capabilities.
.svg)
