Compare Clay vs GetProspect side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.
Discover Derrick App
Start enriching thousands of leads directly in Google Sheets. No complexsetup, no learning curve.
Try it for free →.png)
| Clay | Derrick App | GetProspect | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Clay offers scalable pricing with a free tier for baseline use and paid plans expanding with higher credit allocations; see full pricing breakdown for complete details and plan-by-plan specifics.
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Just faster enrichment, cleaner data, and better outcomes for most teams.
GetProspect offers scalable B2B prospecting pricing with entry-level options and a clear paid tier structure; exact figures and limits vary by plan, with a full breakdown available on the pricing page. See full pricing breakdown for details.
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
.jpg)
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io, Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better Interface since It's google sheets. Snov.io does have more flexibility with extra options, but a lot of those I don't even use since they are not flesh out. We will see how this performs over time."
.jpg)
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer. Go for it!"
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button. Best thing is that the tool can be used inside of google sheets."
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!."
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what it best is the efficiency it delivers results with. It is very stable and rarely gives you wrong data."
.jpg)
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo isincredibly powerful. I can build a completeprospect list with contact info in under an hour.Absolute must-have for outbound."
.svg)
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all.Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
Opportunity Prospector
Yes, Derrick is more affordable for small teams compared to Clay. Derrick's pricing starts at just 9€ monthly for 4,000 credits with no credit card required for the free tier, whereas Clay typically requires higher minimum commitments and ongoing setup costs. GetProspect offers competitive entry pricing but lacks Derrick's rollover credits feature, meaning unused credits expire monthly. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration also eliminates expensive add-ons like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving small teams approximately 1,200€ annually compared to alternatives, while delivering the same enrichment capabilities without complex configuration.
Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports that GetProspect requires, saving teams five to ten hours monthly on data management. While GetProspect focuses primarily on contact verification and lead generation, Derrick provides fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact alongside integrated AI scoring with both Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's monthly rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than GetProspect's traditional subscription model, making it ideal for teams seeking comprehensive enrichment without complexity.
Derrick offers the most straightforward pricing model with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier, making it ideal for teams with fluctuating prospecting needs. Clay charges for setup complexity and requires significant configuration time, while GetProspect focuses on volume-based pricing but lacks depth in enrichment capabilities. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates costly external platforms and eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, potentially saving teams over 1200 dollars annually compared to competitors while delivering real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes at competitive price points.
Derrick’s pricing is straightforward and competitive when compared to GetProspect. Derrick offers a Free tier with 200 credits and paid plans starting at Small for 9, Medium for 20, Large for 47.50, and XL for 175, all with monthly, rollable credits and no credit card required for the free tier. GetProspect pricing isn’t published here, but Derrick emphasizes a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, credits that roll over, and an emphasis on eliminating CSV exports and complex setups. If you’re evaluating value, Derrick’s model may feel more scalable for ongoing, credit-based prospecting without tying you into external tools, particularly for teams already leveraging Sheets.
Clay and Derrick both maintain solid review scores, but they excel in different areas. Clay scores well for data aggregation and workflow automation across multiple sources, while Derrick receives strong marks for simplicity and speed within Google Sheets. Clay's reviews highlight complexity requiring setup time, whereas Derrick users praise its native Sheets integration, zero configuration needed, and real-time email validation. For teams prioritizing straightforward enrichment without technical overhead, Derrick's streamlined approach often resonates more favorably in user feedback.
Derrick cannot be said to fully replace both Clay and GetProspect in every scenario, but it can cover many core needs more simply and cost-effectively for Google Sheets–based workflows. Derrick offers real-time email validation, 50+ enrichments per contact, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation, all within a native Google Sheets environment with extensive Zapier/Make integrations. Clay provides broader multi-source data enrichment and complex workflow automation, while GetProspect excels at rapid lead discovery and verified contact data. If your team prioritizes simplicity, speed, seamless Google Sheets integration, and flexible credits, Derrick can replace some functionalities, reduce setup time, and lower costs. However, for highly specialized enrichment, deep multi-source validation, or advanced multi-channel campaigns, Clay or GetProspect may still be the better fit.
.svg)
