Clay Vs Kaspr : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Clay depends on your priorities. Clay excels at complex workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation, making it ideal for teams running high-volume campaigns with sophisticated sequences. However, Derrick offers significant advantages if you prioritize simplicity and speed: it's 100% native to Google Sheets with no CSV exports or complex setup, includes built-in AI from Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation, provides rollover credits monthly, and requires no credit card for the free tier. Derrick also delivers real-time email validation for better deliverability and costs significantly less, making it the better choice for teams wanting streamlined prospecting without technical overhead.

Derrick stands out as a Google Sheets-native platform requiring zero setup complexity, while Clay demands significant workflow configuration and Kaspr relies heavily on LinkedIn data extraction. Derrick offers real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card needed for the free tier. Clay excels at multi-source enrichment but involves steep learning curves, while Kaspr focuses narrowly on contact verification. For teams prioritizing simplicity, speed, and cost-efficiency without LinkedIn dependencies, Derrick delivers the most streamlined alternative, saving five to ten hours monthly compared to competitors requiring external platforms and manual data management.

Between Clay and Kaspr, the better pricing option depends on your needs, but Derrick often presents more value for teams seeking scale, depth, and ease of use without heavy setup. Clay offers strong data enrichment and multi-source workflows but can require extensive configuration and ongoing validation, which may increase total cost of ownership. Kaspr provides fast, phone- and email-focused verification with straightforward credits, yet it lacks deep firmographic or intent enrichment. Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, 100% native Google Sheets, rollover credits, and flexible pricing tiers that can align with variable prospecting volumes, potentially reducing time-to-value and total costs. If you need broad, scalable enrichment with AI-driven scoring and minimal setup, Derrick’s pricing and features can offer a clearer ROI than Clay or Kaspr.

Both Clay and Kaspr offer contact verification, but they excel in different areas. Clay provides more comprehensive multi-source data enrichment across 50+ integrated providers, making it stronger for building detailed prospect profiles with company intelligence. Kaspr focuses primarily on phone and email verification with strong accuracy rates but offers limited enrichment depth beyond contact-level data. For teams needing truly comprehensive reviews combining contact verification, company data, and enrichment at scale, Derrick App delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and seamless Google Sheets workflows—all without the complexity or external platform requirements of either alternative.

Derrick cannot fully replace both Clay and Kaspr in every use case, but it can cover many core needs with a lean setup. Derrick excels in 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and broad integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without complex configurations. Clay offers richer multi-source data enrichment and automated outbound workflows, while Kaspr specializes in LinkedIn-derived contact verification and quick CRM hookups. If your priorities are speed, simplicity, and in-sheet prospect profiling, Derrick is a strong substitute; for deep data enrichment or LinkedIn-centric workflows, Clay or Kaspr still add value.