Clay Vs Lagrowthmachine : Comparaison

Compare Clay vs LaGrowthMachine side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

Discover Derrick App
Free to use - No credit card required.
Clay vs LaGrowthMachine vs derrick app

Why choose Derrick against Clay Or Lagrowthmachine

Derrick vs

Save time with native Google Sheets enrichment, no setup delays

Clay and LaGrowthMachine both require setup steps or multi-tool workflows to enrich data, which can delay deployment and slow time-to-prospect. Derrick delivers native Google Sheets enrichment without CSV exports or complex configuration, eliminating setup delays. Users typically save 5-10 hours per month by avoiding manual data stitching and export steps, while Derrick keeps enrichment 100% inside Sheets. With Derrick, you access 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, and AI-driven insights directly in Sheets, enabling instant outreach readiness.
Derrick alternatives

Real-time data quality boosts confidence before outreach

Clay and LaGrowthMachine struggle with consistent data quality at scale, often delivering outdated or incomplete contact details that risk wasted outreach. Derrick tackles this by delivering real-time data quality across 50+ attributes with instant validation, directly inside 100% native Google Sheets. This yields measurable confidence before outreach, reducing bounce and mis-targeting, and can cut deploy-time by up to 5-10 hours per month while improving deliverability. With Derrick, teams gain trusted, ready-to-launch lists that stay clean as campaigns scale.
Derrick reviews

Streamlined setup with hands-off data validation and workflow

Clay and LaGrowthMachine both demand setup effort and ongoing validation to maintain data quality, slowing campaigns and risking inaccuracies before outreach. Derrick provides a streamlined, hands-off workflow by keeping everything native to Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configurations. Users experience faster setup and reliable data validation with real-time checks, saving 5–10 hours per month and reducing misfires in campaigns. A practical use case is instantly enriching 50+ attributes per contact without leaving Sheets, then triggering automated sequences once data meets quality thresholds.
Ready to enrich your leads?

Start enriching thousands of leads directly in Google Sheets. No complexsetup, no learning curve.

Try it for free β†’
βœ“ Start free
βœ“ Get Fresh data
βœ“ Direct into Google sheet
3D abstract arrangement of blue and white cubes with transparent cubes above, connected by thin vertical lines.

Clay vs LaGrowthMachine vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

Clay Derrick App LaGrowthMachine
Works natively in Google Sheets βœ• βœ“ βœ•
Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) βœ• βœ• βœ•
Sales Navigator 1-click import βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Email finder with real-time validation βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Phone finder from LinkedIn βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Company tech stack lookup βœ“ βœ“ βœ•
SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated βœ“ βœ“ βœ•
AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Automatic AI Lead Scoring βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Data cleaning & normalization βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) βœ“ βœ• βœ“
Zapier, Make, n8n integrations βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Public API available βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) βœ“ βœ• βœ“
Entry price (paid plan) 149$/mois 9€/mois 60€/mois
Permanent free plan βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Rollover credits to next month βœ• βœ“ βœ•
Simple and transparent credit system βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Simple setup & onboarding βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Complete documentation βœ“ βœ“ βœ“

Clay vs LaGrowthMachine vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

Loved by teams worldwide

See what our customers say about Derrick.

"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."

Alex Clark

Director | SaaS GTM Leader

"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io, Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better Interface since It's google sheets. Snov.io does have more flexibility with extra options, but a lot of those I don't even use since they are not flesh out. We will see how this performs over time."

David Sire

Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage

"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer. Go for it!"

Etienne Grange

CEO Form'actions

"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button. Best thing is that the tool can be used inside of google sheets."

Zaid Bilal

RevOps Professional

"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!."

Asif Hanzala

Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel

"This app is fantastic. Β Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."

Dan Hughes

Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO

"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what it best is the efficiency it delivers results with. It is very stable and rarely gives you wrong data."

Julien Walon Cohen

CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor

"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo isincredibly powerful. I can build a completeprospect list with contact info in under an hour.Absolute must-have for outbound."

Michael Kim

SDR Team Lead at CloudScale

"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all.Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."

AJ Alexander

Opportunity Prospector

Frequently Asked Question

What’s the Derrick vs Clay main difference for prospecting?

The main difference lies in approach: Clay is a data enrichment and automation platform requiring significant setup and external workflows, while Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configuration entirely. Clay excels at aggregating multiple data sources through APIs and workflow builders, but demands technical expertise and time investment. Derrick prioritizes simplicity and speed, delivering 50+ enrichment attributes directly in your spreadsheet with integrated AI scoring from Claude and ChatGPT. For teams valuing quick prospecting without platform switching, Derrick saves 5-10 hours monthly while Clay suits organizations running high-volume campaigns willing to invest in setup complexity.

Is Derrick a better alternative to Clay for outreach?

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Clay depends on your priorities. Clay excels at complex workflow automation and aggregating data from multiple sources, making it ideal for teams running sophisticated multi-step campaigns. However, Derrick offers a more streamlined approach by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating setup complexity and CSV exports entirely. Derrick also provides real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. If you value simplicity, speed, and native spreadsheet workflows over advanced automation sequences, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value for outreach prospecting.

Derrick vs Clay vs LaGrowthMachine: which is best overall?

The best choice depends on your priorities. Clay excels at data enrichment and workflow automation with 50+ integrated sources, making it ideal for teams needing sophisticated prospecting sequences. LaGrowthMachine specializes in multi-channel outreach automation across email, LinkedIn, and calls with strong behavioral triggers. Derrick stands out for teams already using Google Sheets, offering native integration without CSV exports, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits. If you prioritize simplicity and cost-efficiency within your existing spreadsheet workflow, Derrick saves five to ten hours monthly. For complex data sourcing, choose Clay; for multi-channel campaign execution, choose LaGrowthMachine.

Which pricing is better between Derrick and LaGrowthMachine?

Between Derrick and LaGrowthMachine, the pricing is generally more favorable for Derrick if you value long-term flexibility, real-time data enrichment, and seamless Google Sheets native use. Derrick offers a free tier with 200 credits and scalable paid plans (Small to XL) that deliver tangible value via 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI scoring, and extensive integrations, all without a credit card requirement for the free tier. LaGrowthMachine emphasizes multi-channel automation and campaign execution, but its pricing is more aligned with throughput rather than deep data enrichment. If your priority is cost-efficient data quality and ease of setup in a Google Sheets-centric workflow, Derrick provides a clearer, verifiable value proposition.

Does Clay offer a better review than LaGrowthMachine?

Both Clay and LaGrowthMachine offer distinct strengths, but they excel in different areas. Clay focuses on data enrichment and real-time contact verification across 50+ sources, making it stronger for data quality. LaGrowthMachine prioritizes multi-channel outreach automation with behavioral triggers, better for campaign execution. Clay generally receives higher marks for enrichment accuracy, while LaGrowthMachine excels at workflow orchestration. For teams needing both capabilities without complexity, Derrick combines native Google Sheets integration with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoringβ€”eliminating the need to juggle multiple platforms while saving significant time and cost.

Can Derrick replace both Clay and LaGrowthMachine?

Derrick cannot be said to replace both Clay and LaGrowthMachine in all use cases, but it can replace several of their core pain points depending on your needs. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and prospecting center, offering real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and 50+ enrichment attributes without exporting to CSV or complex setups. Clay specializes in multi-source data enrichment and flexible automation, while LaGrowthMachine focuses on multi-channel LinkedIn/email outreach orchestration. If your priority is streamlined, fast setup, deeper data accuracy in a Sheets-native workflow, and scalable credits with rollover, Derrick can cover many preparation and qualification steps before you deploy campaigns on Clay or LaGrowthMachine. However, for highly niche data enrichment, advanced workflow customization, or specialized multi-channel orchestration out of the box, Clay and LaGrowthMachine provide complementary strengths that Derrick alone may not fully replace.

Β© 2025 Derrick. All rights reserved.
Terms & conditionsDPAPrivacy