Clay Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is better than Clay depends on your priorities. Clay excels at complex workflow automation and aggregating data from multiple sources, making it ideal for high-volume campaigns requiring sophisticated sequences. However, Derrick offers a more streamlined approach by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating setup complexity and CSV exports. Derrick also includes real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. If you prioritize simplicity, speed, and native spreadsheet workflows over advanced automation, Derrick provides a more accessible alternative. For teams already invested in Clay's ecosystem or needing multi-source aggregation at enterprise scale, Clay remains competitive. Ultimately, test both to match your team's workflow preferences and technical comfort level.

Derrick and Skrapp take different pricing approaches suited to different team sizes. Skrapp operates on a per-user subscription model, making it costlier for growing teams, while Derrick offers credit-based pricing starting at just nine dollars monthly with rollover credits, meaning unused credits carry forward. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates expensive third-party tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams over twelve hundred dollars annually. For teams prioritizing affordability and flexibility, Derrick's transparent credit system and zero credit card requirement for the free tier provide better budget control than Skrapp's fixed seat-based pricing.

Based on overall user sentiment and feature fit, Derrick tends to receive stronger reviews for its simplicity, speed, and value, especially for teams prioritizing a native Google Sheets workflow and robust enrichment without complex setup. Clay is praised for its real-time data sourcing and automation, but reviews often note setup complexity and data accuracy variability. Skrapp excels at fast email discovery but lacks broader enrichment. If you value a streamlined, all-in-one enrichment and outreach workflow within Sheets, Derrick generally earns better review vibes, with added confidence from features like real-time email validation, AI scoring, 50+ attributes per contact, and extensive integrations.

Derrick, Clay, and Skrapp serve different team needs. Clay excels at complex workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation, making it ideal for high-volume campaigns requiring sophisticated sequences. Skrapp specializes in fast LinkedIn-based contact extraction with strong email validation, perfect for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity. Derrick stands out for teams already using Google Sheets, offering native integration without exports or complex setup, built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, rollover credits, and no credit card requirement for the free tier. Choose based on your workflow preference: Clay for automation depth, Skrapp for LinkedIn speed, or Derrick for Sheets-native simplicity and cost efficiency.

Derrick cannot fully replace both Clay and Skrapp for enrichment in all use cases. Derrick excels as a native Google Sheets enrichment platform with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation, plus extensive integrations and the benefit of a 100% no-code, CSV-free workflow. However, Clay offers multi-source real-time data synthesis and complex automation workflows, while Skrapp provides fast, LinkedIn-driven contact discovery and verification. Derrick can cover broad enrichment needs efficiently, but teams with deep source diversity or specialized discovery may still rely on Clay or Skrapp for specific gaps.