Clay Vs Wiza : Comparaison

Derrick offers a more streamlined alternative to Clay if you prioritize simplicity and speed. While Clay excels at complex workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation, it requires significant setup time and technical knowledge. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without CSV exports or complex configuration, saving five to ten hours monthly. Both platforms provide data enrichment, but Derrick includes integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT for automatic scoring and segmentation. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility than Clay's traditional pricing model, making it ideal for teams seeking faster implementation and ease of use.

Derrick offers transparent, credit-based pricing starting at zero dollars with no credit card required, making it accessible for teams testing the platform. Clay operates on a subscription model with variable pricing based on usage and data sources, while Wiza focuses primarily on LinkedIn automation with its own pricing structure. Derrick's standout advantage is rollover credits monthly, meaning unused credits carry forward without expiration, providing genuine flexibility for teams with fluctuating prospecting volumes. Additionally, Derrick's integration directly within Google Sheets eliminates expensive third-party tools, potentially saving thousands annually compared to Clay's complex setup requirements or Wiza's LinkedIn-dependent approach.

Wiza's strength is accurate contact data and scalable LinkedIn-based outreach, but its data depth stops at surface-level profiles and relies heavily on LinkedIn data quality and ongoing validation. Clay offers broader data enrichment with multiple sources yet can suffer from accuracy variability and setup complexity. Derrick sits in the middle by delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and a native Google Sheets workflow with seamless automation, all without CSV exports or complex integrations, plus credits that roll over and no required card for the free tier. This combination often yields more consistent, actionable data at speed for B2B outreach.

The pricing fit depends on your team's priorities. Wiza focuses exclusively on LinkedIn automation with lower entry costs but limited enrichment depth, making it ideal for volume-driven outreach. Derrick offers broader data enrichment capabilities with rollover credits, no credit card required for the free tier, and transparent monthly pricing starting at just nine dollars. If you need comprehensive prospect data beyond LinkedIn profiles, Derrick provides better long-term value with fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact and integrated AI tools for segmentation, whereas Wiza works best as a focused LinkedIn-only solution.

Yes, Derrick can effectively replace both Clay and Wiza for many parts of your workflow, but with caveats. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and prospecting hub, offering real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, AI scoring and segmentation, and seamless automation across 3000+ integrations, all without CSV exports or complex setup. Clay provides multi-source data enrichment and dynamic prospecting workflows, while Wiza focuses on LinkedIn-driven outreach and contact verification. Derrick consolidates data enrichment, outreach planning, and CRM-ready outputs in one place, reducing setup time and manual data wrangling. If your needs center on real-time enrichment, email deliverability, and scalable outreach from Sheets, Derrick can replace both, though you may want to supplement with dedicated data verification or LinkedIn-specific tactics only if your strategy relies heavily on those modes.