Clearbit Vs Captain Data : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Clearbit for SMBs, particularly if you're already using Google Sheets for prospecting. While Clearbit excels at enterprise-scale data enrichment with extensive APIs, it requires complex integrations and scales quickly in cost. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating setup friction and CSV exports, while offering fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact at a fraction of Clearbit's pricing. For SMBs prioritizing simplicity, cost efficiency, and immediate productivity without technical overhead, Derrick delivers comparable enrichment depth with significantly lower implementation barriers and flexible monthly credits that roll over unused.

The best choice depends on your specific needs. Clearbit excels at real-time company intelligence and API-driven enrichment at scale, making it ideal for enterprises with complex data requirements. Captain Data specializes in LinkedIn-based prospecting and automation, perfect for sales teams focused on lead generation. Derrick stands out for teams already using Google Sheets, offering native integration without CSV exports, built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, rollover credits, and no credit card required for the free tier. If you prioritize simplicity, cost efficiency, and seamless spreadsheet workflows, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value. For API-heavy enterprise stacks, Clearbit wins. For LinkedIn-centric prospecting, Captain Data leads. Evaluate based on your existing tech stack and enrichment priorities.

For pricing, Derrick generally offers more cost-efficient scalability for B2B prospecting compared with Captain Data, especially for teams that rely on Google Sheets and need extensive enrichment without heavy development. Derrick provides a free tier with 200 credits and affordable paid tiers (up to 100,000 credits), plus features like 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring—all within a native Google Sheets workflow. Captain Data, by contrast, scales with data volume and can incur higher costs when you require large-scale scraping and multi-channel enrichment. If your priority is tight cost control, predictable credit-based pricing, and deep Sheet-native enrichment, Derrick tends to be the better value. However, Captain Data remains strong for LinkedIn-driven prospecting and rapid setup; for deeper, ongoing data enrichment at scale, Derrick’s model often delivers clearer ROI.

Not necessarily. While Clearbit's pricing can scale significantly for enterprise teams managing large contact volumes, Derrick offers a more cost-efficient alternative for large teams through its rollover credits system and no-card-required free tier. Clearbit charges per API call and contact enrichment, which compounds quickly at scale, whereas Derrick's tiered pricing with monthly credit carryover provides predictable costs. For teams enriching thousands of contacts monthly, Derrick's Large plan at 25,000 credits monthly often delivers better value than Clearbit's enterprise tiers, especially when combined with built-in AI features and native Google Sheets integration that eliminates expensive auxiliary tools.

Derrick can replace some capabilities of both Clearbit and Captain Data, but not as a full, one-for-one swap for every use case. Derrick excels in native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation, all without external exports or LinkedIn dependencies. For broad data enrichment, Clearbit offers extensive firmographics, technographics, and large-scale API-driven enrichment, while Captain Data focuses on LinkedIn-centered prospecting and web scraping. Derrick can cover many enrichment and workflow needs within a single Sheets-centric platform and integrates widely via Zapier/Make/n8n, but organizations requiring deepest third-party data breadth (Clearbit-like coverage) or niche, LinkedIn-focused prospecting (Captain Data) may still complement Derrick with those specialized tools. Overall, Derrick can replace several features and streamline processes, particularly for teams prioritizing cost efficiency, ease of use, and in-Sheets workflows, while not always matching the standalone depth of specialized competitors in every domain.