Clearbit Vs Clay : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Clearbit for small teams, particularly if you're already using Google Sheets. While Clearbit excels at comprehensive firmographic data and real-time enrichment at scale, Derrick offers a more streamlined, cost-effective approach native to Google Sheets with no complex integrations required. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and rollover credits starting at just 9 dollars monthly, making it ideal for small teams prioritizing simplicity and budget efficiency over enterprise-level data volume.

Derrick operates as a fully native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex integrations that both Clearbit and Clay require. While Clearbit excels at firmographic data accuracy and Clay offers workflow automation, Derrick combines enrichment with integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, all within your spreadsheet. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact make it ideal for teams prioritizing simplicity and cost efficiency. Choose Derrick if you want a streamlined, all-in-one prospecting hub without switching between platforms.

Derrick pricing compares favorably on simplicity and cost control versus Clay and Clearbit. Derrick offers a clear credits-based model starting with a free tier of 200 credits and scalable paid tiers: Small 4,000 credits for $9, Medium 10,000 for $20, Large 25,000 for $47.50, and XL 100,000 for $175, with credits rollable and no credit card required for the free tier. By contrast, Clearbit pricing scales quickly with data enrichment needs and can be costly at scale, while Clay pricing and setup can be complex due to its multi-source data and outbound automation. Derrick’s native Google Sheets integration, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring/segmentation offer a streamlined, budget-friendly alternative for teams prioritizing speed, ease of use, and predictable costs, especially for those already using Google Sheets and needing simple, scalable prospecting without heavy customization.

Derrick and Clay differ significantly in their data enrichment approach and feature architecture. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports, while Clay requires separate interface navigation and manual data transfers. Derrick provides integrated AI capabilities with both Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation, whereas Clay focuses primarily on workflow automation across multiple data sources. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no-card-required free tier offer greater flexibility for teams with variable enrichment volumes compared to Clay's usage-based model.

Derrick can replace some workflow needs that Clearbit and Clay address, but not necessarily all of them. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment platform with fast real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations, all without CSV exports or complex setup. Clearbit specializes in broad, high-coverage company and contact intelligence with strong CRM/marketing workflow integration, but its pricing can scale quickly and it’s often used as a data enabler within a larger stack. Clay focuses on real-time data sourcing, outbound automation, and integrated workflows, yet can require more configuration and data verification. If your workflows hinge on Google Sheets-centric enrichment, real-time validation, and cost-efficient, flexible credits, Derrick can replace or reduce reliance on both for many use cases. However, for teams needing deepest firmographic/technographic breadth at scale (Clearbit) or highly customizable, multi-source outbound automation (Clay) as standalone pillars, you may still benefit from complementary solutions alongside Derrick.