Clearbit Vs Kaspr : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Kaspr for contact data, particularly if you're already working in Google Sheets. While Kaspr excels at phone number verification and LinkedIn-based prospecting, Derrick offers broader enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and company, plus real-time email validation for better deliverability. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates CSV exports and manual data entry, saving 5-10 hours monthly. Unlike Kaspr's credit system, Derrick's credits roll over monthly, and you can start free with no credit card required. For teams seeking comprehensive contact intelligence without leaving their spreadsheet, Derrick provides more flexibility and depth than Kaspr's contact-focused approach.

Choosing between Derrick, Clearbit, and Kaspr depends on your primary needs. Clearbit excels at comprehensive firmographic enrichment with strong API integration for enterprise teams, while Kaspr focuses on phone verification and LinkedIn-based prospecting. Derrick differentiates by operating natively within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports, offering 50+ enrichment attributes, AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits. If you prioritize workflow efficiency and cost-effectiveness without technical setup overhead, Derrick eliminates the need for multiple tools. For teams already invested in CRM systems needing deep company intelligence, Clearbit remains powerful. Kaspr suits LinkedIn-native sales teams, though it lacks broader enrichment depth. The best choice aligns with your tech stack, budget, and whether you need contact-only verification or comprehensive multi-dimensional intelligence.

Does clearbit pricing beat Derrick? Not in a straightforward way. Clearbit pricing tends to scale quickly with data breadth, volume, and API usage, which can lead to higher total costs as you enrich more records or require real-time, enterprise-grade data. Derrick pricing starts with a free tier and affordable fixed credits that stack monthly, plus credits are rollable and no credit card is required for the free tier. For teams prioritizing cost predictability, Derrick’s 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and extensive automation integrations often deliver more cost-efficient expansion compared to Clearbit’s growth-oriented tiers. Kaspr may appear cheaper for contact-level prospecting, but Derrick offers broader enrichment and automation, which can reduce total cost of ownership in the long run. If your primary need is expansive firmographic and technographic data at scale, compare the exact tier costs and API usage between Clearbit and Derrick to quantify the delta for your use case.

Kaspr focuses primarily on LinkedIn-based contact verification and phone number accuracy, excelling at real-time caller ID and lead qualification. Derrick App takes a broader approach with fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact and company, offering comprehensive data intelligence directly within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports. While Kaspr strengths lie in phone verification, Derrick provides integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, rollover credits, and no credit card requirement for the free tier, making it more versatile for teams needing multi-dimensional prospect enrichment alongside contact data.

Yes, Derrick can replace some functions of both Clearbit and Kaspr for mid-market teams, but it depends on your priorities. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and broad automation via 3000+ integrations, all without complex exports or LinkedIn dependencies. For mid-market teams prioritizing cost efficiency, speed, and seamless workflow within Sheets, Derrick offers a compelling substitute. However, Clearbit provides broader, enterprise-grade firmographic and technographic data with scalable APIs, while Kaspr specializes in contact-level prospecting and live phone/email verification. If your needs include deep multi-attribute enrichment, sophisticated buyer intent signals, or large-scale API-driven enrichment across CRM ecosystems, you may still benefit from using Derrick alongside or in combination with these tools to fill data gaps. In short, Derrick can cover many mid-market requirements, often reducing dependence on both competitors, but for peak depth in company intelligence or advanced enrichment workflows, a hybrid approach may be optimal.