Clearbit Vs Surfe : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Clearbit for SMBs, particularly if you're already using Google Sheets for prospecting. While Clearbit excels at comprehensive data enrichment and API integration, it comes with scaling costs that can quickly become expensive for smaller teams. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating complex integrations and CSV exports, while offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring from Claude and ChatGPT. For SMBs prioritizing cost efficiency and ease of use over enterprise-scale API infrastructure, Derrick's flexible, rollover credits and no-credit-card free tier make it significantly more accessible than Clearbit's premium pricing model.

Surfe excels at LinkedIn-specific contact extraction with real-time data verification and browser extension convenience, making it ideal for quick prospecting workflows. However, Surfe's enrichment depth is limited to surface-level LinkedIn data without comprehensive company intelligence or technographic insights. Derrick App handles LinkedIn data through a different approach, offering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact alongside AI-powered scoring and segmentation directly in Google Sheets. While Surfe prioritizes speed in LinkedIn research, Derrick provides deeper multi-source enrichment without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, delivering more comprehensive B2B context for advanced prospecting and sales operations at a lower total cost of ownership.

Pricing for Derrick, Clearbit, and Surfe varies by model and usage. Clearbit pricing is typically tiered and scales with data enrichment volume, which can become costly for large contact libraries. Surfe Pricing centers on LinkedIn-driven prospecting with plans that reflect outreach and data extraction limits, often costing less than enterprise-grade enrichment. Derrick App, by contrast, offers a transparent, credit-based system: free tier with 200 credits, then Small (4,000 credits for $9), Medium (10,000 for $20), Large (25,000 for $47.50), and XL (100,000 for $175). Derrick’s credits are rollable, 100% native to Google Sheets, and require no credit card for the free tier, making it a cost-effective starting point for teams prioritizing in-sheet prospecting, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring, all without the typical CSV exports or additional integrations some competitors demand. If you need broad data breadth and omnichannel enrichment, Clearbit may justify higher spend; if you focus on LinkedIn-centric prospecting, Surfe could be a lean option. Derrick stands out on total cost control, ease of use, and native Google Sheets workflow.

Yes, comparing Clearbit and Surfe for data enrichment is somewhat fair but incomplete. Clearbit excels at comprehensive firmographic and technographic intelligence with real-time API integration across millions of companies, making it ideal for enterprise-scale enrichment. Surfe, however, focuses primarily on LinkedIn contact extraction rather than deep data enrichment, serving as a prospecting tool instead. While both append data to records, Clearbit offers broader business intelligence whereas Surfe captures surface-level contact information. For teams needing true multi-source data enrichment with flexible workflows and cost efficiency, exploring platforms like Derrick App that operate natively within your existing tools without complex integrations can provide a more comprehensive alternative suited to different operational needs and budgets.

Yes, Derrick can replace both Clearbit and Surfe in a single stack, but with caveats. Derrick centralizes enrichment directly in Google Sheets and adds specialized capabilities—50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and seamless integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n—without needing LinkedIn data as a prerequisite. Clearbit excels at broad firmographic and technographic enrichment and is strongest when used alongside other tools; Surfe specializes in LinkedIn-based contact discovery and verification but lacks deep company intelligence. Derrick offers a broader, native enrichment layer that complements or substitutes both, especially for teams prioritizing depth of data, cost control, and a streamlined, no-code workflow, though organizations with heavy reliance on LinkedIn-specific sourcing should evaluate how Surfe’s strengths align with Derrick’s capabilities.