Cognism Vs Captain Data : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Cognism depends on your team's specific needs. Cognism excels at verified contact data and intent signals, particularly for enterprise teams prioritizing data accuracy in EMEA markets. However, Derrick offers distinct advantages for teams already using Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports while providing 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier also provide more flexibility than Cognism's premium pricing model, making it particularly valuable for teams seeking cost-effective enrichment without complex integrations.

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing model with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, starting at just 9€ for 4000 credits with no credit card required for the free tier. Cognism positions itself as a premium enterprise solution with higher costs but strong data accuracy, while Captain Data charges based on volume with potential scalability issues. Derrick's transparent, credit-based pricing combined with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact delivers exceptional value for SMBs and growing teams seeking affordability without sacrificing data quality or requiring expensive LinkedIn integrations.

Based on typical pricing positioning, Cognism tends to be premium with higher costs, reflecting its extensive data quality and compliance features, while Captain Data offers more affordable, scalable pricing tied to data volume and scraping needs. If you compare these two, Captain Data usually presents a lower entry price and faster ROI for straightforward data collection. Derrick, by contrast, adds value with native Google Sheets, monthly rollovers of credits, and a broad set of enrichment attributes without requiring a credit card for the free tier. For teams prioritizing cost-effective, scalable data enrichment and seamless workflow integration, Derrick often delivers better overall value, especially when you factor in 3,000+ integrations and AI-driven scoring that complement the data you collect from Cognism or Captain Data.

Derrick can effectively handle sourcing tasks that both Cognism and Captain Data address, but with different strengths. While Cognism excels at verified contact data and intent signals for enterprise teams, and Captain Data focuses on LinkedIn automation, Derrick provides native Google Sheets integration without external platforms or CSV exports, saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick's fifty-plus enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and rollover credits offer cost-effective coverage for most sourcing needs. However, teams requiring deep EMEA intelligence or specialized LinkedIn workflows may benefit from layering Derrick with these tools rather than replacing them entirely, depending on your specific prospecting requirements and budget.

Derrick and Captain Data serve different core needs, so the review differences reflect that. Derrick is praised for its 100% native Google Sheets workflow, eliminating CSV exports and complex setups while delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation via Claude and ChatGPT. Users often highlight cost efficiency, especially since Derrick avoids LinkedIn-centric constraints and offers monthly rollovers of credits with a free tier no credit card requirement. Captain Data earns points for LinkedIn-based prospecting, easy web scraping, and multi-channel enrichment, but reviewers consistently note deeper data enrichment gaps beyond LinkedIn, a steeper learning curve for advanced automation, and occasional CRM integration friction. In short, Derrick tends to be favored for scalable, sheet-native enrichment and ease of use, while Captain Data shines for fast LinkedIn-driven prospecting but may require supplementary tools for richer company data and complex workflows.