Cognism Vs Getprospect : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is better than Cognism depends on your team's priorities. Cognism excels at verified contact data and intent signals, particularly for enterprise teams prioritizing data accuracy. However, Derrick offers distinct advantages for teams already using Google Sheets, eliminating manual exports and CSV workflows while saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick's integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT enables automated scoring and segmentation directly in Sheets, plus rollover credits provide flexibility that Cognism's fixed pricing doesn't. For cost-conscious teams seeking native spreadsheet prospecting without complex integrations, Derrick is the more practical choice. For enterprise-scale intelligence requiring deep market insights, Cognism remains stronger.

Pricing-wise, Derrick offers the most flexible and affordable approach. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and provides 200 credits monthly, with plans starting at just $9 for 4,000 credits. Cognism and GetProspect typically charge higher monthly minimums without rollover flexibility. Derrick's unused credits roll over each month, eliminating waste, while its native Google Sheets integration eliminates costly LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions that competitors often require. For budget-conscious teams, Derrick delivers superior value through lower entry costs and transparent per-credit pricing without hidden fees or mandatory platform add-ons.

Cognism and GetProspect both excel at core prospecting tasks, but they differ in focus and depth. Cognism emphasizes data accuracy, GDPR/CCPA compliance, and intent signals for enterprise targeting, with strong contact verification and CRM integrations. GetProspect leans toward rapid list-building, strong email verification, and ease of use for high-volume basic outreach. Derrick differentiates by being 100% native Google Sheets with extensive enrichment (50+ attributes), real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, plus broad automation via Zapier/Make/n8n and rollover credits. If you prioritize data quality and account-based signals, Cognism is solid; for quick, scalable lists with simple workflows, GetProspect fits. Derrick adds native workflow efficiency and deeper enrichment without leaving Sheets, which can streamline complex prospecting pipelines.

Derrick and GetProspect serve different prospecting needs. GetProspect focuses on lead generation and email verification with a user-friendly interface, making it solid for straightforward outreach campaigns. However, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or external platforms, saving teams five to ten hours monthly on data management. Derrick also integrates AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation, offers fifty plus contact attributes per record, and features rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. For teams prioritizing seamless workflow integration and comprehensive data enrichment without platform switching, Derrick delivers greater operational efficiency.

Derrick could partially replace GetProspect for data enrichment, but it depends on your needs. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment platform with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and thousands of integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. GetProspect emphasizes fast, scalable contact discovery and email verification with solid CRM integrations, but its enrichment depth and niche data coverage can lag behind. If your workflow relies heavily on deep firmographic/behavioral enrichment and high-volume list building, you may want to pair Derrick with GetProspect or Cognism for complementary data. For teams prioritizing seamless in-sheet enrichment, automation, and cost flexibility, Derrick offers a strong, standalone alternative, especially given its free tier and credit rollovers.