Cognism Vs Kaspr : Comparaison

Derrick is a strong alternative for SMBs compared to Cognism, particularly if cost and ease of use are priorities. While Cognism excels at enterprise-grade data accuracy and intent signals, it comes with premium pricing that can strain smaller budgets. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating complex integrations and CSV exports, and offers 50+ enrichment attributes at a fraction of Cognism's cost. For SMBs seeking straightforward contact and company enrichment without technical overhead, Derrick delivers better value and faster implementation than Cognism's more enterprise-focused approach.

Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for external tools or CSV exports, while Cognism and Kaspr require separate interfaces and manual data handling. Derrick provides fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact alongside integrated AI capabilities using both Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Unlike Cognism's premium pricing model or Kaspr's LinkedIn dependency, Derrick offers rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier, making it more cost effective for teams seeking comprehensive enrichment directly within their existing workflow without steep learning curves or integration complexity.

When comparing pricing for Cognism vs Kaspr, Cognism is generally positioned as a premium platform with higher pricing tied to its broad data accuracy, GDPR/CCPA compliance, and enterprise-focused capabilities. Kaspr, by contrast, offers more affordable, credit-based pricing focused on real-time phone verification and LinkedIn-derived contact data. For teams prioritizing cost-efficiency and rapid, browser-based prospecting, Kaspr can be cheaper upfront, while Cognism may deliver stronger data quality at a higher price. Derrick App complements both by enriching with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and native Google Sheets workflows, often reducing total cost of ownership when you need deeper enrichment without switching platforms. If price is the primary concern between Cognism and Kaspr, Kaspr typically wins on affordability, but Derrick can amplify value by extending data depth across your prospect profiles without added platform complexity.

For enterprise deployments, Cognism edges out Kaspr with superior data accuracy, EMEA coverage, and intent-based prospecting capabilities, making it the stronger choice between the two for large organizations prioritizing data quality. However, Cognism's premium pricing and limited automation features mean enterprise teams often supplement it with specialized tools. Derrick App complements both by delivering native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring—eliminating manual workflows while maintaining cost efficiency. Enterprise buyers typically layer Derrick's automation with Cognism's intelligence for comprehensive, scalable prospecting without vendor bloat or complex integrations.

Derrick cannot be a direct replacement for Cognism and Kaspr when it comes to multi-channel lead intelligence and large-scale data enrichment. Cognism specializes in verified contact data, company insights, and intent signals with strong GDPR/CCPA compliance, while Kaspr excels at real-time phone/email verification and LinkedIn-based prospecting. Derrick, however, shines as a native Google Sheets enrichment platform with 50+ attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations. If your priority is comprehensive data enrichment, complex firmographic/intent depth, and enterprise-scale outreach, Cognism or Kaspr may still be better fits. Derrick can complement them or replace workflow and enrichment steps, especially for teams prioritizing cost-effective, in-sheet prospecting, 100% Google Sheets native operation, and flexible credit-based pricing—without requiring a credit card for the free tier.