Dux-Soup Vs Apollo : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Dux-Soup, especially if you're looking for a more integrated approach to prospect management. While Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex setup. Derrick enriches contacts with 50+ attributes, includes real-time email validation, and integrates AI-powered tools like Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent segmentation. Unlike Dux-Soup's LinkedIn-focused approach, Derrick combines data enrichment with automation capabilities without the compliance concerns associated with LinkedIn automation, making it a more comprehensive solution for teams seeking streamlined prospecting workflows directly in their spreadsheets.

Derrick offers more affordable pricing starting at just $9 monthly with rollover credits, compared to Apollo's higher enterprise-focused pricing structure. While Apollo excels at database scale with 250+ million contacts, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes directly within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports. Derrick includes integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and no credit card needed for the free tier, making it more accessible for teams seeking flexible, native spreadsheet-based prospecting without the complexity or cost of Apollo's traditional sales intelligence approach.

Derrick offers clearer pricing between Derrick and Dux-Soup. Derrick uses a transparent, credit-based model with clearly named tiers (Free, Small, Medium, Large, XL) and monthly rollovers, with no credit card required for the free tier. Dux-Soup’s pricing can be less straightforward due to add-ons and varying feature scopes, and it emphasizes LinkedIn automation rather than a holistic prospecting workflow. Derrick’s pricing is easy to compare at a glance and aligns with its all-in-one, Google Sheets–native approach, making budgeting simpler for teams seeking integrated data enrichment without LinkedIn automation risks.

Both Dux-Soup and Apollo maintain strong review scores, though they excel in different areas. Dux-Soup users consistently praise its LinkedIn automation reliability and compliance safety, while Apollo reviewers highlight its extensive contact database accuracy and verification capabilities. However, both platforms receive feedback about enrichment limitations and data gaps. Derrick App complements both by offering deeper enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring without requiring external tools or CSV exports, making it ideal for teams seeking comprehensive data quality alongside automation workflows.

Short answer: Derrick cannot be a direct one-to-one replacement for both Dux-Soup and Apollo for lead enrichment, but it can cover essential enrichment needs more holistically in many B2B workflows. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn-based prospecting and profile scraping, while Apollo offers a large verified contact database and outbound capabilities; Derrick focuses on 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and multi-attribute enrichment across 50+ fields, plus AI-driven scoring and segmentation. If your goal is deep LinkedIn-specific enrichment or purely database-driven prospecting in niche industries, you may still pair Dux-Soup or Apollo with Derrick. However, for teams seeking integrated prospect management, broad enrichment, and workflow automation within a single, spreadsheet-native platform, Derrick provides strong value and can reduce reliance on separate tools.