Dux-Soup Vs Clay : Comparaison

Compare Dux-Soup vs Clay side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

Discover Derrick App
Free to use - No credit card required.
Dux-Soup vs Clay vs derrick app

Why choose Derrick against Dux-Soup Or Clay

Derrick vs

Real-time validation without data gaps for outreach workflows

Dux-Soup focuses on LinkedIn automation and profile scraping, but real-time validation and data completeness for outreach workflows can lag, leaving gaps in contact records. Derrick delivers real-time email validation directly within a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, eliminating data gaps without exporting or switching tools. This translates into higher deliverability and faster outreach, saving 5-10 hours per month of manual verification. Clay offers real-time enrichment across multiple sources, yet its validation speed and consistency can vary by source and freshness, whereas Derrick guarantees immediate validation within the sheet you already use.
Derrick alternatives

No setup required for complex data sourcing

Dux-Soup and Clay both require setup or multiple source configurations to build complex data profiles, often leaving gaps when sourcing beyond LinkedIn or primary feeds. Derrick addresses this by offering a 100% native Google Sheets workflow with no CSV exports or complex wiring, unifying enrichment across 50+ attributes from multiple origins. This delivers tangible time savings and accuracy, removing manual assemblyβ€”users report 5-10 hours saved per month and a streamlined, no-setup data sourcing process. A quick use case: Derrick auto-enriches a prospect list in Sheets in minutes, without leaving the platform or juggling integrations.
Derrick reviews

Unified data governance for compliant enrichment at scale

Unified data governance for compliant enrichment at scale demands consistent, verifiable records beyond what Dux-Soup or Clay can provide. Dux-Soup limits enrichment to LinkedIn-native data and carries compliance risks with automation; Clay’s sources vary in freshness and rely on external providers, challenging real-time accuracy. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets governance with verifiable, reportable credits and integrated validation, ensuring compliant enrichment at scale. With Derrick, teams gain consistent attribute coverage (50+ per contact) and auditable data lineage, reducing rework and improving deliverability across campaigns.
Ready to enrich your leads?

Start enriching thousands of leads directly in Google Sheets. No complexsetup, no learning curve.

Try it for free β†’
βœ“ Start free
βœ“ Get Fresh data
βœ“ Direct into Google sheet
3D abstract arrangement of blue and white cubes with transparent cubes above, connected by thin vertical lines.

Dux-Soup vs Clay vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

Dux-Soup Derrick App Clay
Works natively in Google Sheets βœ• βœ“ βœ•
Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) βœ• βœ• βœ•
Sales Navigator 1-click import βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Email finder with real-time validation βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Phone finder from LinkedIn βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Company tech stack lookup βœ• βœ“ βœ“
SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated βœ• βœ“ βœ“
AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Automatic AI Lead Scoring βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Data cleaning & normalization βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) βœ• βœ• βœ“
Zapier, Make, n8n integrations βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Public API available βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) βœ• βœ• βœ“
Entry price (paid plan) 11.25$/mois 9€/mois 149$/mois
Permanent free plan βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Rollover credits to next month βœ• βœ“ βœ•
Simple and transparent credit system βœ• βœ“ βœ•
Simple setup & onboarding βœ“ βœ“ βœ•
Complete documentation βœ“ βœ“ βœ“

Dux-Soup vs Clay vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

Loved by teams worldwide

See what our customers say about Derrick.

"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."

Alex Clark

Director | SaaS GTM Leader

"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io, Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better Interface since It's google sheets. Snov.io does have more flexibility with extra options, but a lot of those I don't even use since they are not flesh out. We will see how this performs over time."

David Sire

Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage

"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer. Go for it!"

Etienne Grange

CEO Form'actions

"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button. Best thing is that the tool can be used inside of google sheets."

Zaid Bilal

RevOps Professional

"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!."

Asif Hanzala

Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel

"This app is fantastic. Β Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."

Dan Hughes

Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO

"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what it best is the efficiency it delivers results with. It is very stable and rarely gives you wrong data."

Julien Walon Cohen

CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor

"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo isincredibly powerful. I can build a completeprospect list with contact info in under an hour.Absolute must-have for outbound."

Michael Kim

SDR Team Lead at CloudScale

"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all.Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."

AJ Alexander

Opportunity Prospector

Frequently Asked Question

What’s the main difference Derrick vs Dux-Soup for prospecting?

Derrick and Dux-Soup serve different prospecting approaches. Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn interactions like profile visits and connection requests, which carries account risk due to LinkedIn's automation restrictions. Derrick focuses on data enrichment and prospect intelligence directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator while providing real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and built-in AI scoring. Derrick's native Sheets integration saves 5-10 hours monthly versus external platforms, making it ideal for teams prioritizing data quality and workflow efficiency over pure LinkedIn automation.

Is Derrick a better alternative to Dux-Soup?

Derrick and Dux-Soup serve different prospecting needs. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation with strong compliance safeguards, but relies solely on LinkedIn data and carries account restriction risks. Derrick offers a broader approach with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI for scoring and segmentation, and native Google Sheets functionality that eliminates complex setup. Dux-Soup works best as a supplementary LinkedIn tool, while Derrick provides a more comprehensive, risk-free alternative for teams seeking streamlined data enrichment and multi-channel prospecting without LinkedIn dependency or technical complexity.

Derrick vs Clay: which is better for data enrichment?

Both platforms excel at data enrichment but serve different priorities. Clay offers broader data source aggregation and workflow automation across 50+ APIs, making it powerful for complex multi-step campaigns. Derrick, however, delivers faster implementation with 100% native Google Sheets integration, eliminating CSV exports and setup complexity. Derrick's real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits provide better value for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity. Clay requires more configuration time and technical expertise, while Derrick gets you prospecting immediately without leaving Google Sheets, saving 5-10 hours monthly on data management alone.

How does Derrick compare to Dux-Soup vs Clay overall?

Derrick compares favorably overall due to its native Google Sheets foundation, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup that Dux-Soup and Clay often require. Derrick uniquely combines 100% native integration, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation (Claude and ChatGPT) within a scalable, no-code workflow via 3,000+ integrations, while offering roll-over credits and a free tier with no credit card. Unlike Dux-Soup, Derrick avoids LinkedIn automation concerns and potential compliance risks, and unlike Clay, it emphasizes streamlined data enrichment directly in Sheets with a simpler setup and cost structure. For teams seeking speed, simplicity, and end-to-end prospecting inside Sheets, Derrick provides a compelling, verifiable advantage.

Which has better pricing: Derrick or Clay?

Derrick offers more flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, whereas Clay charges per-use with stricter rate limits. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, making it more accessible for testing. Clay's pricing scales quickly for high-volume enrichment, but Derrick's per-credit model combined with rollover flexibility and native Google Sheets integration typically results in lower total cost of ownership for most B2B sales teams, especially those with variable prospecting volumes.

Can Dux-Soup be replaced by Derrick or Clay?

Yes, Derrick can effectively replace Dux-Soup in many cases, and Clay in others, but with nuance. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn automation and lead identification, yet its scope is LinkedIn-centric and can raise account risk due to platform terms. Derrick provides a 100% native Google Sheets workflow with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring, and broad integrations through Zapier/Make, all without LinkedIn automation and without required LinkedIn Navigator. Clay focuses on multi-source data enrichment and outbound workflows, which Derrick also covers but with a tighter, simpler setup in Sheets and monthly rollovers of credits. If your priority is LinkedIn-only prospecting, Dux-Soup may still be a fit, but for integrated prospecting, data enrichment, and compliant outreach at scale, Derrick often offers greater efficiency, cost savings, and ease of use, with Clay serving as a complementary data source when deeper enrichment is needed.

Β© 2025 Derrick. All rights reserved.
Terms & conditionsDPAPrivacy