Compare Dux-Soup vs Clay side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.
Discover Derrick App








Start enriching thousands of leads directly in Google Sheets. No complexsetup, no learning curve.
Try it for free β.png)
| Dux-Soup | Derrick App | Clay | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | β | β | β |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | β | β | β |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | β | β | β |
| Email finder with real-time validation | β | β | β |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | β | β | β |
| Company tech stack lookup | β | β | β |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | β | β | β |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | β | β | β |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | β | β | β |
| Data cleaning & normalization | β | β | β |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | β | β | β |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | β | β | β |
| Public API available | β | β | β |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | β | β | β |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 11.25$/mois | 9β¬/mois | 149$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | β | β | β |
| Rollover credits to next month | β | β | β |
| Simple and transparent credit system | β | β | β |
| Simple setup & onboarding | β | β | β |
| Complete documentation | β | β | β |

Dux-Soup offers entry-level pricing with a free tier and scalable paid plans starting at affordable monthly rates; see full pricing breakdown for complete details. View complete pricing details on the dedicated Dux-Soup pricing page.
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, Β No endless configuration. No learning curve.
β
Just faster enrichment, cleaner data, and better outcomes for most teams.

Clay offers real-time data enrichment with flexible pricing starting at a low entry point; plans and credits scale for high-volume outreach, with a comprehensive pricing page detailing all tiers and add-ons. See full pricing breakdown for complete details.
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
.jpg)
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io, Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better Interface since It's google sheets. Snov.io does have more flexibility with extra options, but a lot of those I don't even use since they are not flesh out. We will see how this performs over time."
.jpg)
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer. Go for it!"
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button. Best thing is that the tool can be used inside of google sheets."

RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!."

Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Β Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."

Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what it best is the efficiency it delivers results with. It is very stable and rarely gives you wrong data."
.jpg)
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo isincredibly powerful. I can build a completeprospect list with contact info in under an hour.Absolute must-have for outbound."
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all.Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
Opportunity Prospector
Derrick and Dux-Soup serve different prospecting approaches. Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn interactions like profile visits and connection requests, which carries account risk due to LinkedIn's automation restrictions. Derrick focuses on data enrichment and prospect intelligence directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator while providing real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and built-in AI scoring. Derrick's native Sheets integration saves 5-10 hours monthly versus external platforms, making it ideal for teams prioritizing data quality and workflow efficiency over pure LinkedIn automation.
Derrick and Dux-Soup serve different prospecting needs. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation with strong compliance safeguards, but relies solely on LinkedIn data and carries account restriction risks. Derrick offers a broader approach with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI for scoring and segmentation, and native Google Sheets functionality that eliminates complex setup. Dux-Soup works best as a supplementary LinkedIn tool, while Derrick provides a more comprehensive, risk-free alternative for teams seeking streamlined data enrichment and multi-channel prospecting without LinkedIn dependency or technical complexity.
Both platforms excel at data enrichment but serve different priorities. Clay offers broader data source aggregation and workflow automation across 50+ APIs, making it powerful for complex multi-step campaigns. Derrick, however, delivers faster implementation with 100% native Google Sheets integration, eliminating CSV exports and setup complexity. Derrick's real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits provide better value for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity. Clay requires more configuration time and technical expertise, while Derrick gets you prospecting immediately without leaving Google Sheets, saving 5-10 hours monthly on data management alone.
Derrick compares favorably overall due to its native Google Sheets foundation, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup that Dux-Soup and Clay often require. Derrick uniquely combines 100% native integration, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation (Claude and ChatGPT) within a scalable, no-code workflow via 3,000+ integrations, while offering roll-over credits and a free tier with no credit card. Unlike Dux-Soup, Derrick avoids LinkedIn automation concerns and potential compliance risks, and unlike Clay, it emphasizes streamlined data enrichment directly in Sheets with a simpler setup and cost structure. For teams seeking speed, simplicity, and end-to-end prospecting inside Sheets, Derrick provides a compelling, verifiable advantage.
Derrick offers more flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, whereas Clay charges per-use with stricter rate limits. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, making it more accessible for testing. Clay's pricing scales quickly for high-volume enrichment, but Derrick's per-credit model combined with rollover flexibility and native Google Sheets integration typically results in lower total cost of ownership for most B2B sales teams, especially those with variable prospecting volumes.
Yes, Derrick can effectively replace Dux-Soup in many cases, and Clay in others, but with nuance. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn automation and lead identification, yet its scope is LinkedIn-centric and can raise account risk due to platform terms. Derrick provides a 100% native Google Sheets workflow with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring, and broad integrations through Zapier/Make, all without LinkedIn automation and without required LinkedIn Navigator. Clay focuses on multi-source data enrichment and outbound workflows, which Derrick also covers but with a tighter, simpler setup in Sheets and monthly rollovers of credits. If your priority is LinkedIn-only prospecting, Dux-Soup may still be a fit, but for integrated prospecting, data enrichment, and compliant outreach at scale, Derrick often offers greater efficiency, cost savings, and ease of use, with Clay serving as a complementary data source when deeper enrichment is needed.