Dux-Soup Vs Expandi : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Dux-Soup for LinkedIn prospecting, offering a fundamentally different approach. While Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn interactions directly, Derrick enriches prospect data within Google Sheets without automation compliance risks. Derrick provides 50+ contact and company attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring—all natively in Sheets with no LinkedIn Sales Navigator required. You save time on manual research, avoid account restrictions, and gain deeper prospect intelligence for more targeted outreach, making Derrick ideal if you prioritize data quality and workflow efficiency over pure automation volume.

Derrick is a Google Sheets-native data enrichment platform that eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams approximately $1,200 annually compared to Expandi's ecosystem dependencies. While Expandi excels at LinkedIn automation and messaging workflows, Derrick focuses on enriching prospect data with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI powered by Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent segmentation and scoring. Pricing-wise, Derrick offers rollover credits starting at $9 monthly with no credit card required for the free tier, whereas Expandi operates on a subscription model tied to outreach volume. For teams seeking comprehensive data enrichment without LinkedIn Sales Navigator costs, Derrick provides superior value and workflow efficiency directly within Google Sheets.

For pricing, Derrick App generally offers a simple credit-based model with a free tier and scalable paid plans (Free 200 credits, Small 4,000, Medium 10,000, Large 25,000, XL 100,000 credits) that roll over monthly and require no credit card for the free tier. Dux-Soup and Expandi price their tools differently, typically on monthly subscription tiers tied to features and contact limits, with additional costs for data enrichment or multi-channel capabilities. If you value cost efficiency tied to high onboarding speed and native Google Sheets workflows, Derrick’s pricing can be more economical, especially since it eliminates CSV exports, LinkedIn dependency, and offers extensive credits that align with large-scale prospecting without significant lock-in.

Derrick offers superior team review capabilities through its native Google Sheets integration, eliminating the need for external platforms or complex data exports that slow down collaborative workflows. Unlike Expandi, which requires LinkedIn automation setup and manual campaign configuration, Derrick provides real-time data enrichment directly within your spreadsheet with 50+ attributes per contact. Teams can instantly verify email accuracy, segment prospects using integrated AI Claude and ChatGPT, and maintain a single source of truth without switching between tools. Expandi excels at LinkedIn outreach automation but lacks Derrick's comprehensive data enrichment and team collaboration efficiency, making Derrick faster for prospect review and qualification at scale.

No. Dux-Soup and Expandi are both LinkedIn-focused automation tools, but they serve different ends in multi-channel workflows. Dux-Soup enhances LinkedIn prospecting with automated visits and sequences, while Expandi specializes in scalable LinkedIn outreach with personalized sequences and multi-step campaigns. Neither fully replaces the other for multi-channel workflows beyond LinkedIn. Derrick, by contrast, offers native Google Sheets data enrichment, multi-channel prospecting, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation without relying on LinkedIn automation, making it a more complete multi-channel solution. If your goal is pure LinkedIn automation, either Dux-Soup or Expandi fits; if you need integrated multi-channel prospecting and richer data, Derrick adds distinct value.