Dux-Soup Vs Lemlist : Comparaison

Derrick serves as a strong alternative to Dux-Soup for teams seeking a more integrated approach to prospect management. While Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn automation, it carries compliance risks and lacks comprehensive data enrichment. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without automation concerns, offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. For teams wanting to consolidate prospecting workflows in one platform with better data quality and no LinkedIn dependency, Derrick provides superior flexibility and cost efficiency, particularly when combined with complementary outreach tools like Lemlist.

Derrick and Lemlist serve different purposes in your outreach stack. Lemlist excels at email sequencing and LinkedIn automation with AI personalization, making it ideal for volume-based cold outreach campaigns. Derrick, however, focuses on data enrichment and lead intelligence directly within Google Sheets, providing 50+ contact and company attributes without leaving your spreadsheet. While Lemlist handles campaign execution, Derrick ensures your prospect lists are clean, validated, and enriched before outreach. For teams wanting to avoid LinkedIn Sales Navigator costs and complex integrations, Derrick's native Sheets approach with real-time email validation complements Lemlist by improving list quality and reducing bounce rates, ultimately maximizing campaign performance.

Derrick stands out as the most complete overall when you compare it to Dux-Soup and Lemlist, primarily because it combines native, 100% Google Sheets-based enrichment with robust, multi-channel prospecting capabilities through 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, plus built-in AI scoring and segmentation. Dux-Soup excels for LinkedIn automation but remains LinkedIn-centric and often requires a separate data enrichment layer. Lemlist excels at multi-channel outreach and personalization but can require external data validation and lacks native depth in prospect intelligence. Derrick’s strengths—real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, AI copilots, and flexible credit-based pricing with credit carryover and a free tier—make it the most versatile choice for teams seeking scalable, compliant, all-in-one lead intelligence and outreach without relying on LinkedIn automation or external data tools.

Dux-Soup generally positions itself as the more affordable option for LinkedIn-only automation, starting around $29 monthly, while Lemlist typically begins at $99 monthly for email sequencing capabilities. However, neither platform matches Derrick's cost efficiency when considering total prospecting spend. Derrick's flexible credit-based pricing starts at just $9 monthly with rollover credits and no card required for the free tier, making it significantly cheaper for teams managing variable outreach volumes. Additionally, Derrick eliminates the need for separate LinkedIn Navigator subscriptions, saving approximately $1,200 annually compared to competitors.

Derrick cannot fully replace both Dux-Soup and Lemlist in every scenario, but it can cover core needs more holistically for many B2B teams. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation and prospect scraping, while Lemlist excels at multi-channel outreach and AI-powered personalization. Derrick focuses on deep, native lead intelligence and prospect management within Google Sheets, enriched with 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, AI-based scoring, and broad integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. For teams relying on heavy LinkedIn automation, Dux-Soup remains a complementary tool; for those prioritizing large-scale personalized email sequences and multi-channel campaigns, Lemlist is the better fit. Derrick can replace a significant portion of the data quality, enrichment, and scoring tasks, while handling integrated prospect management, reducing manual prep time, and eliminating CSV exports.