Dux-Soup Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

Derrick serves teams differently than Skrapp by offering comprehensive data enrichment directly within Google Sheets rather than focusing solely on email extraction. While Skrapp excels at quick contact discovery, Derrick provides fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring capabilities without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator. For teams seeking a complete prospecting hub with monthly rollover credits and native spreadsheet workflows, Derrick eliminates the need for multiple tools and reduces manual data handling by five to ten hours monthly, making it a more integrated alternative for growing sales operations.

The winner depends on your primary needs. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn automation and compliance, Skrapp specializes in fast email extraction with high accuracy, while Derrick stands out for comprehensive data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and native Google Sheets functionality. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving significant costs annually, and offers rollover credits with no card required for the free tier, making it ideal for teams seeking all-in-one intelligence without platform switching or complex configurations.

Based on pricing structures, Derrick generally offers a more accessible and flexible model for B2B teams, especially with its free tier and monthly credit rollovers, which can be more cost-efficient than Dux-Soup’s plan-based approach that scales with automation features. Derrick’s pricing (Free 200 credits; Small 4000; Medium 10,000; Large 25,000; XL 100,000) paired with no credit card required for the free tier and the ability to repurpose credits across Tik, email, and enrichment workflows can reduce total cost of ownership. Dux-Soup pricing centers on tiered plans for automation, which can become pricier for high-volume campaigns, and its value is tightly bound to LinkedIn activity. If your goal is integrated prospecting with native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring within Derrick, Derrick generally provides better pricing value, with the added benefit of more extensive 50+ enrichment attributes and broad integrations that can replace separate tools.

Yes, Derrick compares favorably to Skrapp in several meaningful ways. While Skrapp excels at basic email extraction, Derrick offers deeper data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and company, plus integrated AI scoring and segmentation using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup, while Skrapp requires browser extensions and manual workflows. Additionally, Derrick provides real-time email validation, rollover credits, and no credit card needed for the free tier, making it a more comprehensive solution for teams seeking intelligence beyond simple contact discovery.

Short answer: Dux-Soup cannot fully replace Skrapp for LinkedIn prospecting, and Derrick offers a more complete alternative when you need integrated prospecting, enrichment, and outreach without LinkedIn automation concerns. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn automation and profile scraping, while Skrapp specializes in fast email/phone extraction and data enrichment across LinkedIn and web sources. Skrapp provides strong data accuracy for contact details, but it lacks deep company insights and multi-source enrichment. Derrick, by contrast, combines 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and seamless Google Sheets-based prospecting with no CSV exports or complex setups. If your primary need is pure LinkedIn scraping versus email discovery, Dux-Soup or Skrapp may fit separately; however, Derrick offers a more holistic, compliant, and scalable solution for B2B prospecting without automation risks on LinkedIn.