Evaboot Vs Adapt.Io : Comparaison

Compare Evaboot vs Adapt.io side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

Discover Derrick App
Free to use - No credit card required.
Evaboot vs Adapt.io vs derrick app

Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Adapt.Io

Derrick vs

Enrichment in Sheets without complex automation overhead

Derrick delivers enrichment directly inside Google Sheets, whereas Evaboot and Adapt.io require additional steps or tools to achieve similar results. Unlike Evaboot and Adapt.io, Derrick is 100% native in Sheets with no complex automation overhead, eliminating export/import bottlenecks. This enables immediate enrichment across 50+ attributes per contact or company, reducing manual data handling and saving 5-10 hours per month. For quick workflows, Derrick’s real-time validation and AI-assisted scoring keep prospect data accurate right where you work.
Derrick alternatives

Real-time validation without data drift concerns

Evaboot and Adapt.io both struggle with real-time validation across multi-source data, often introducing delays or requiring manual checks that risk data drift. Derrick delivers real-time validation natively within Google Sheets, eliminating export steps or complex glue code. This results in immediate, drift-free accuracy on every enrichment action, reducing wasted hours and improving deliverability by up to 15% in typical campaigns. With Derrick, you validate as you enrich, keeping datasets consistent without latency bottlenecks.
Derrick reviews

Seamless AI-Powered Enrichment for Complex Data Sets

Derrick tackles the cryptic challenge Evaboot and Adapt.io face with complex datasets by delivering seamless AI-powered enrichment directly inside 100% native Google Sheets, avoiding external export/migration hurdles. Unlike Evaboot and Adapt.io, which struggle with deep multi-source enrichment and real-time adaptability, Derrick leverages integrated AI (Claude and ChatGPT) and 50+ attributes per contact to fuse firmographic, technographic, and behavioral signals in one pass. Users gain tangible impact: up to 50+ enriched fields per contact and faster prospection workflows within Sheets, cutting hours of manual enrichment. Practical use: auto-segmentation and summarization for targeted outreach without leaving the spreadsheet.
Ready to enrich your leads?

Start enriching thousands of leads directly in Google Sheets. No complexsetup, no learning curve.

Try it for free β†’
βœ“ Start free
βœ“ Get Fresh data
βœ“ Direct into Google sheet
3D abstract arrangement of blue and white cubes with transparent cubes above, connected by thin vertical lines.

Evaboot vs Adapt.io vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

Evaboot Derrick App Adapt.io
Works natively in Google Sheets βœ• βœ“ βœ•
Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) βœ“ βœ• βœ•
Sales Navigator 1-click import βœ“ βœ“ βœ•
Email finder with real-time validation βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Phone finder from LinkedIn βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Company tech stack lookup βœ• βœ“ βœ•
SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated βœ• βœ“ βœ•
AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Automatic AI Lead Scoring βœ• βœ“ βœ•
Data cleaning & normalization βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) βœ• βœ• βœ“
Zapier, Make, n8n integrations βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Public API available βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) βœ• βœ• βœ“
Entry price (paid plan) 39$/mois 9€/mois 49$/mois
Permanent free plan βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Rollover credits to next month βœ“ βœ“ βœ•
Simple and transparent credit system βœ• βœ“ βœ“
Simple setup & onboarding βœ“ βœ“ βœ“
Complete documentation βœ“ βœ“ βœ“

Evaboot vs Adapt.io vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

Loved by teams worldwide

See what our customers say about Derrick.

"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."

Alex Clark

Director | SaaS GTM Leader

"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io, Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better Interface since It's google sheets. Snov.io does have more flexibility with extra options, but a lot of those I don't even use since they are not flesh out. We will see how this performs over time."

David Sire

Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage

"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer. Go for it!"

Etienne Grange

CEO Form'actions

"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button. Best thing is that the tool can be used inside of google sheets."

Zaid Bilal

RevOps Professional

"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!."

Asif Hanzala

Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel

"This app is fantastic. Β Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."

Dan Hughes

Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO

"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what it best is the efficiency it delivers results with. It is very stable and rarely gives you wrong data."

Julien Walon Cohen

CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor

"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo isincredibly powerful. I can build a completeprospect list with contact info in under an hour.Absolute must-have for outbound."

Michael Kim

SDR Team Lead at CloudScale

"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all.Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."

AJ Alexander

Opportunity Prospector

Frequently Asked Question

Which Derrick vs Evaboot comparison highlights key differences?

The key difference between Derrick and Evaboot centers on integration approach and user accessibility. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or complex configuration, saving teams five to ten hours monthly on data management. Evaboot functions as a standalone platform requiring manual data transfers and integration setup. Additionally, Derrick includes integrated AI capabilities with both Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation, while Evaboot relies on predefined workflows. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for free tier provide greater flexibility for growing teams compared to Evaboot's scaling cost structure.

Is Derrick a better Evaboot alternative for teams?

Derrick is purpose-built for teams working directly in Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex integrations that Evaboot and Adapt.io require. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring and Adapt.io at data integration, Derrick combines native spreadsheet functionality with AI-powered enrichment using Claude and ChatGPT, offering fifty-plus contact and company attributes. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and integrated email validation provide better value and flexibility for teams prioritizing simplicity and cost efficiency in their prospecting workflows.

Derrick vs Evaboot vs Adapt.io: which is best overall?

Derrick stands out as the only platform fully native to Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configurations while saving five to ten hours monthly. Unlike Evaboot and Adapt.io, Derrick requires no LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscription, cutting annual costs by twelve hundred dollars. Built-in AI with Claude and ChatGPT enables automated scoring and segmentation, while rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide superior flexibility. With fifty plus enrichment attributes and real-time email validation, Derrick delivers comprehensive B2B prospecting directly where your team already works.

Does Evaboot replace Derrick for simple automations?

No. Evaboot is designed for no-code, straightforward automations and basic data enrichment, while Derrick offers deeper, native Google Sheets integration with 100% Sheet-based workflows, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and more advanced enrichment capabilities. Evaboot excels in ease of use for simple tasks and basic CRM lead scoring, but it lacks Derrick’s extensive AI features, granular enrichment options, and broad integration reach (2500+ apps via Zapier/Make). For simple automations, Evaboot can be a quick fit, yet Derrick provides stronger long-term value for teams seeking richer data quality, richer reports, and scalable outreach without leaving Google Sheets. If you compare only two, Evaboot is more limited versus Derrick; against Adapt.io, Derrick still offers stronger AI-driven insights and native Google Sheets workflow, whereas Adapt.io emphasizes connectors and data movement.

How does Evaboot pricing compare to Adapt.io's plans?

Evaboot and Adapt.io take different pricing approaches, with Evaboot focusing on lead scoring automation while Adapt.io emphasizes data integration capabilities. Both platforms charge based on usage volume, though exact pricing structures vary by data throughput and feature tier. Evaboot typically scales higher for large datasets, while Adapt.io offers more predictable mid-market pricing. However, Derrick provides a refreshing alternative with transparent, rollover-friendly credits starting at just nine dollars monthly, no credit card required for the free tier, and fifty-plus enrichment attributes included across all plans, making it more cost-effective for teams seeking straightforward prospecting without hidden scaling costs.

What’s a fair Derrick review versus Evaboot and Adapt.io?

A fair Derrick review versus Evaboot and Adapt.io highlights how Derrick is a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment platform that eliminates CSV exports and complex setups, saving 5-10 hours per month. Unlike Evaboot, Derrick integrates directly with Sheets and offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and embedded AI (Claude and ChatGPT) for scoring and segmentation, all without requiring a credit card for the free tier. Compared to Adapt.io, Derrick provides a richer, no-code Google Sheets-centric workflow, broader AI-driven insights, and transferable credits that can be rolled over monthly, making it more cost-efficient for teams already using Sheets and needing scalable enrichment without heavy integration work. Evaboot excels in ease of use for basic lead scoring, while Adapt.io focuses on connectors and data movement; Derrick stands out in depth of enrichment, AI capabilities, and sheet-centric ease of use.

Β© 2025 Derrick. All rights reserved.
Terms & conditionsDPAPrivacy