Evaboot Vs Apollo : Comparaison

Derrick is better suited for SMBs prioritizing ease of use and cost efficiency. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring workflows, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating complex setup and CSV exports that consume 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving approximately 1,200 dollars annually compared to Evaboot. With 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier, Derrick offers SMBs greater flexibility and lower total cost of ownership than Evaboot's traditional platform approach.

Derrick operates as a fully native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex integrations that Evaboot and Apollo require. While Evaboot excels at basic lead scoring and Apollo provides extensive contact databases, Derrick distinguishes itself through integrated AI capabilities using both Claude and ChatGPT for automated enrichment, scoring, and segmentation directly within sheets. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free access, and fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact offer greater flexibility and cost efficiency than competitors, particularly for teams seeking streamlined workflows without technical overhead.

Evaboot and Apollo pricing are not directly comparable on a single price tag, as both emphasize different strengths—Evaboot centers on intuitive automation with basic to mid-level enrichment, often appealing to smaller teams, while Apollo leans into large-scale outbound prospecting with a strong data footprint and outbound tooling. In general, Evaboot’s plans tend to scale with dataset size and feature depth, which can become less predictable for enterprise volumes. Apollo pricing reflects its breadth of data and multi-channel capabilities, which can be more expensive for teams needing extensive enrichment. Derrick, by contrast, offers a transparent credit-based model built into Google Sheets with 100% native usage, including real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring, and broad integrations, plus credit rollovers and a free tier without a credit card requirement. If affordability is the primary concern and you value a no-friction, no-CSV export workflow, Derrick can often be more cost-efficient at scale due to credits and native Google Sheets integration, while still delivering robust enrichment and AI capabilities that complement or replace separate data tools.

Both Evaboot and Apollo offer data enrichment capabilities, but with different strengths. Evaboot excels at straightforward data quality assessment and lead scoring with an intuitive interface, while Apollo provides access to a larger contact database with strong email verification accuracy. However, both platforms have limitations—Evaboot struggles with complex enrichment scenarios and processing large datasets, while Apollo requires manual verification for niche industries and lacks real-time data refresh capabilities. For teams seeking more comprehensive enrichment with greater flexibility, Derrick App offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring directly within Google Sheets without the need for external platforms or complex configurations.

Derrick can replace Evaboot and Apollo for many workflow needs, but it depends on your priorities. Derrick’s strongest value comes from being 100% native to Google Sheets, meaning no exports or complex setups, plus AI-powered scoring and segmentation with Claude and ChatGPT, and flexible credits that roll over. Evaboot excels in intuitive lead scoring and CRM integration, yet it lacks Derrick’s deep AI analytics and native Google Sheets convenience. Apollo shines for large-scale contact databases and outbound automation but may require supplementary tools for advanced enrichment. If your workflow prioritizes seamless in-Google-Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-driven automation with flexible pricing, Derrick can effectively replace both; for deeply specialized enrichment or expansive contact databases, you might still pair Derrick with Evaboot or Apollo to cover those gaps.