Evaboot Vs Clay : Comparaison

Derrick is a strong alternative to Evaboot for SMBs, particularly if your team values simplicity and cost efficiency. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring workflows, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configurations that consume 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT at competitive pricing with rollover credits. Unlike Evaboot, Derrick requires no LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscription, potentially saving SMBs around $1,200 annually. For teams prioritizing straightforward prospecting without technical overhead, Derrick delivers faster implementation and greater flexibility.

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup that Evaboot and Clay require, saving teams five to ten hours monthly. Pricing-wise, Derrick's credits roll over each month with no credit card needed for the free tier, whereas Evaboot and Clay charge fixed monthly fees regardless of usage. For use cases, Derrick excels for teams wanting streamlined enrichment directly in their spreadsheets with built-in AI scoring, while Evaboot suits basic automation needs and Clay works best for high-volume outreach campaigns requiring extensive workflow customization.

Evaboot and Clay both offer data enrichment, but they differ in depth and real-time capabilities. Evaboot excels at straightforward enrichment with an easy setup and strong data quality checks for standard datasets, yet its enrichment depth and multi-source verification can be limited for complex, enterprise-grade needs. Clay delivers broader data sourcing, real-time validation, and automation across multiple sources, but results can vary with data freshness and source reliability. Derrick stands out by providing 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring within Google Sheets, making complex enrichment faster and more controllable. Credits can be rolled over, and no credit card is required for the free tier.

Evaboot is a solid option for basic lead scoring and qualification workflows, particularly if your team values simplicity and quick implementation. However, it lacks the comprehensive data enrichment depth that Clay provides for outreach campaigns. Clay excels at aggregating contact data from 50+ sources and automating complex prospecting sequences, making it better suited for high-volume outreach. That said, if you're already working in Google Sheets and want to avoid external platforms entirely, Derrick offers a 100% native alternative that eliminates CSV exports, includes AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and provides real-time email validation—all without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving significant monthly costs compared to both Evaboot and Clay.

Derrick cannot fully replace both Evaboot and Clay in one platform for every scenario, but it can cover many core needs more seamlessly. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets with advanced AI-powered scoring, real-time email validation, and extensive automation through 3000+ integrations, offering strong data enrichment and prospecting capabilities within a familiar sheet-based workflow. Evaboot shines in straightforward lead evaluation and CRM integration, while Clay excels at real-time data sourcing, multi-source enrichment, and complex outreach workflows. If your requirements are heavy on advanced enrichment depth or highly customized multi-source workflows, you may still benefit from Evaboot or Clay in addition to Derrick. However, for teams prioritizing speed, ease of use, cost efficiency, and AI-driven segmentation within Sheets, Derrick provides a compelling consolidated alternative without exporting CSVs or managing separate tools.