Evaboot Vs Demandbase : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Evaboot for SMB teams, particularly if you're already using Google Sheets. Unlike Evaboot's standalone platform requiring data exports and complex integrations, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating manual workflow steps and saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick provides fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact and company with real-time email validation, comparable data quality to Evaboot but with significantly lower costs. At nine euros monthly for four thousand credits, Derrick undercuts Evaboot's pricing while offering rollover credits, no credit card requirements for free tiers, and integrated AI scoring capabilities that Evaboot lacks, making it more cost-effective and efficient for resource-constrained SMB teams prioritizing streamlined prospecting workflows.

All three platforms serve different core functions, making a direct comparison complex. Derrick focuses on data enrichment directly within Google Sheets with AI-powered scoring and email validation, requiring no external tools or CSV exports. Evaboot specializes in workflow automation and lead qualification with CRM integration, excelling at behavioral scoring but lacking deep data enrichment capabilities. Demandbase is an enterprise ABM platform designed for account-level intelligence and intent data, not individual contact enrichment. For teams seeking lightweight, affordable enrichment without implementation complexity, Derrick offers the most accessible entry point. If you need account-level insights, Demandbase is the choice, though it demands significant investment and ops resources. Evaboot bridges qualification and scoring but requires supplementary enrichment tools for comprehensive prospect profiles.

In short, Evaboot generally does not offer better pricing for small teams when compared to Derrick. Evaboot targets easy, low-friction automation with straightforward plans, but its pricing often scales with data volume and feature needs, which can become less predictable for small teams. Derrick, by contrast, offers a transparent tiered credits model starting at 0€ for the free tier and smaller paid packages (e.g., 9€ for 4,000 credits), plus 100% native Google Sheets integration, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and credits rollovers, all without requiring a credit card for the free tier. This combination tends to deliver better cost control and immediate value for small teams, particularly those already using Google Sheets and needing rapid, scalable enrichment. If your small team prioritizes simplicity and cost predictability, Derrick’s pricing and native integration offer a compelling alternative to Evaboot. Demandbase is more enterprise-oriented and generally not directly comparable on pricing for SMBs; it targets ABM, which typically incurs higher total costs.

Demandbase focuses primarily on account-based marketing and high-level account intelligence with intent signals, making it ideal for enterprise teams seeking sophisticated target account identification. Derrick, conversely, specializes in direct contact enrichment and outbound prospecting automation within Google Sheets, enabling faster individual prospect research without complex setup. While Demandbase excels at account prioritization, it requires significant implementation overhead and data cleanup, whereas Derrick delivers immediate value through native Sheets integration, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, and AI-powered scoring—making it more accessible for teams needing rapid, hands-on prospecting workflows without enterprise infrastructure demands.

From users, Derrick is typically seen as a highly practical choice for teams prioritizing native Google Sheets integration, immediate value, and ease of use. Compared to Evaboot, Derrick often scores higher on real-time email validation, broader enrichment attributes per contact, and built-in AI scoring without needing extra tools, while avoiding CSV exports and onboarding friction. When pitted against Demandbase, users note Derrick’s strength in fast, low-friction prospecting automation and flexible credit-based pricing, making it more approachable for SMBs and teams not requiring enterprise-scale ABM workflows. In short, Derrick is praised for simplicity, speed, and richer per-contact data in a familiar sheet-based workflow, with Evaboot and Demandbase excelling in deeper analytics and ABM capabilities respectively.