Evaboot Vs Findymail : Comparaison

Derrick offers distinct advantages for SMBs compared to Evaboot. While Evaboot excels at basic lead scoring, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and company with native Google Sheets integration, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup. Derrick's integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT enables advanced segmentation and automated scoring without additional tools. Crucially, Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving SMBs around 1200 dollars annually. With rollover credits, no credit card required for the free tier, and transparent pricing starting at 9 dollars monthly, Derrick delivers superior flexibility and cost efficiency for resource-constrained teams managing prospecting workflows within their existing spreadsheet environment.

Derrick offers superior pricing flexibility with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier, starting at just $9 monthly for 4,000 credits. Unlike Evaboot, Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets with zero CSV exports needed, saving teams 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, while Evaboot requires external tools for comprehensive data enrichment. For email discovery, Findymail focuses solely on email verification, whereas Derrick delivers broader firmographic data, real-time validation, and 3,000+ integrations through Zapier and Make, making it a more complete prospecting solution without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions.

Based on pricing structure and value, Derrick generally offers more cost-effective options for teams prioritizing Google Sheets native workflows and flexible credit use. Evaboot pricing tends to scale with data enrichment needs and can become less predictable for large volumes, while Derrick provides a transparent tiered model (Free, Small, Medium, Large, XL) with rolling credits that are reportable and no credit card required for the free tier. Additionally, Derrick’s 100% native Google Sheets integration and the ability to avoid LinkedIn Sales Navigator costs can yield substantial annual savings compared to Evaboot, which relies more on standalone automation and data enrichment. For teams focused on scalable, budget-friendly prospecting within Sheets, Derrick often presents better pricing value, with the added benefit of AI scoring and multiple integrations as usage grows. If your priority is purely email verification and basic discovery, Findymail's pricing may be competitive, but Derrick remains stronger on total cost of ownership and feature breadth for enrichment, automation, and forecasting.

Reviews of Derrick highlight its seamless Google Sheets integration and AI-powered enrichment capabilities, which users appreciate for eliminating manual CSV workflows. Evaboot receives praise for intuitive lead scoring and CRM integration, though reviewers note its limited data enrichment depth compared to comprehensive platforms. Derrick's 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation generally outperform Evaboot's basic qualification features, while Derrick's rollover credits and no-credit-card free tier offer better flexibility. Both platforms serve different needs, but Derrick edges ahead for teams prioritizing data richness and operational efficiency without requiring external tools or LinkedIn Sales Navigator licenses.

Derrick cannot be accurately described as a direct replacement for Evaboot in lead qualification, because Evaboot is primarily designed for lead scoring and basic data enrichment with strong CRM integration and a focus on engagement signals, while Derrick is a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and prospecting platform that adds multiple data attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and extensive automation via 3000+ integrations. Derrick enhances qualification by providing deeper enrichment (50+ attributes), AI-powered scoring, and seamless workflow within Sheets, which can complement or augment Evaboot’s lead scoring. If your need is single-tool simplicity for basic qualification, Evaboot may suffice; for richer data, custom scoring, and a fully native Sheets-based workflow, Derrick offers tangible advantages. In some scenarios, teams use both: Evaboot for initial lead capture and enrichment, Derrick for advanced scoring, segmentation, and automation to finalize lead qualification.