Compare Evaboot vs PhantomBuster side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.
Discover Derrick App








Start enriching thousands of leads directly in Google Sheets. No complexsetup, no learning curve.
Try it for free β.png)
| Evaboot | Derrick App | PhantomBuster | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | β | β | β |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | β | β | β |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | β | β | β |
| Email finder with real-time validation | β | β | β |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | β | β | β |
| Company tech stack lookup | β | β | β |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | β | β | β |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | β | β | β |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | β | β | β |
| Data cleaning & normalization | β | β | β |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | β | β | β |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | β | β | β |
| Public API available | β | β | β |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | β | β | β |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9β¬/mois | 69$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | β | β | β |
| Rollover credits to next month | β | β | β |
| Simple and transparent credit system | β | β | β |
| Simple setup & onboarding | β | β | β |
| Complete documentation | β | β | β |
Evaboot offers a starting plan with a free tier and paid options scaling by usage and features; see the full pricing breakdown for exact credits, limits, and tier details. For complete pricing details, view the Evaboot pricing page.
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, Β No endless configuration. No learning curve.
β
Just faster enrichment, cleaner data, and better outcomes for most teams.
PhantomBuster offers entry-level pricing with a free tier and scalable paid plans for larger data tasks; detailed pricing varies by usage and plan. See the full pricing breakdown on the dedicated PhantomBuster Pricing page for complete details.
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
.jpg)
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io, Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better Interface since It's google sheets. Snov.io does have more flexibility with extra options, but a lot of those I don't even use since they are not flesh out. We will see how this performs over time."
.jpg)
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer. Go for it!"
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button. Best thing is that the tool can be used inside of google sheets."

RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!."

Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Β Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."

Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what it best is the efficiency it delivers results with. It is very stable and rarely gives you wrong data."
.jpg)
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo isincredibly powerful. I can build a completeprospect list with contact info in under an hour.Absolute must-have for outbound."
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all.Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
Opportunity Prospector
The key differences between Derrick and Evaboot center on platform architecture and enrichment depth. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and reducing setup friction by five to ten hours monthly, while Evaboot functions as a standalone platform requiring external integrations. Derrick delivers fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation and integrated AI scoring using both Claude and ChatGPT, whereas Evaboot excels primarily at straightforward lead qualification with limited enrichment capabilities. Additionally, Derrick's monthly rollover credits and free tier requiring no credit card provide greater budget flexibility for growing teams compared to Evaboot's scaling costs that become disproportionate with data volume.
Derrick is a strong alternative to Evaboot for SMBs, particularly those already using Google Sheets. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring and CRM integration, Derrick eliminates the need for external platforms entirelyβit's 100% native to Google Sheets with no CSV exports or complex setup required. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI from Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation. Unlike Evaboot, Derrick's credits roll over monthly and requires no credit card for the free tier, making it more cost-effective and flexible for growing SMBs managing variable prospecting volumes.
Derrick offers a more integrated approach by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports that Evaboot and PhantomBuster require. While PhantomBuster excels at web automation and Evaboot at straightforward lead scoring, Derrick combines 50+ enrichment attributes with built-in AI capabilities using both Claude and ChatGPT for advanced segmentation and validation. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and real-time email validation provide greater flexibility and cost efficiency for growing teams compared to both competitors' scaling pricing models.
Between Evaboot and PhantomBuster, Derrick offers clearer value on pricing for B2B data enrichment and outreach. Evaboot pricing scales with data enrichment needs and can become less predictable at scale, while PhantomBusterβs usage-based costs can spike with high-volume scraping and enrichment. Derrick provides a flat-structured credits system (with monthly rollovers) and a free tier, plus 100% native Google Sheets integration and AI-powered scoring, which can reduce overall costs and setup time without exporting or tooling overhead. If you prioritize predictable budgeting and Google Sheets-first workflows, Derrick often represents the better pricing option.
Derrick offers significantly more flexible pricing with monthly rollover credits, meaning unused credits carry forward unlike traditional per-month subscriptions. You also eliminate the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving approximately 1,200 dollars annually compared to Evaboot's typical requirements. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card upfront, while providing 200 credits to test the platform. Additionally, Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates expensive data export workflows and manual processing that Evaboot users often encounter, reducing operational overhead and hidden costs throughout your prospecting workflow.
Derrick does not merely replace Evaboot and PhantomBuster for data enrichment; it offers a different, more comprehensive approach within a single native Google Sheets ecosystem. Unlike Evaboot, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring and segmentation, all without leaving Sheets. Compared to PhantomBuster, Derrick adds robust data quality and enrichment depth by combining enrichment with automation, AI insights, and a large array of native integrations, reducing the need for multiple tools. For teams seeking a true all-in-one enrichment and scoring solution within Sheets, Derrick often provides greater depth and consistency, while Evaboot and PhantomBuster remain strong for lighter automation and extraction tasks.