Evaboot Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

Derrick offers stronger advantages for most teams compared to Evaboot. While Evaboot excels at basic lead scoring, it struggles with processing speed on large datasets and lacks advanced enrichment capabilities. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex setup, and includes 50+ enrichment attributes plus integrated AI from Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Derrick also provides rollover credits and requires no credit card for the free tier, making it more cost-effective and flexible than Evaboot's unpredictable scaling pricing for growing teams.

Derrick offers the most cost-effective solution when you factor in total ownership costs. Evaboot requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions and scales unpredictably with data volume, while Skrapp functions primarily as a contact finder without deeper enrichment. Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits—all without requiring a credit card for the free tier. At nine dollars monthly for 4,000 credits, you eliminate expensive third-party tool stacking, saving five to ten hours weekly on data management and reducing overall prospecting infrastructure costs significantly compared to both competitors.

Based on pricing structures, Evaboot and Skrapp offer competitive pricing for smaller teams, but Derrick often delivers greater value at similar or lower monthly costs when you consider total cost of ownership. Evaboot pricing scales with data and automation needs, while Skrapp focuses on prospecting with limited enrichment at higher data volumes. Derrick provides 100% native Google Sheets integration with a free tier and monthly roll-over credits, plus 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, AI-powered scoring, and no credit card required for the free tier. For teams seeking long-term cost efficiency and broader capabilities without exporting data or paying for external tools, Derrick tends to offer the better pricing-value mix compared to Evaboot and Skrapp.

Skrapp specializes in LinkedIn-based email extraction and contact discovery, making it excellent for rapid prospecting workflows. However, Derrick provides deeper lead enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact including firmographics, intent signals, and behavioral data that Skrapp lacks. While Skrapp excels at finding emails, Derrick enriches those contacts comprehensively within Google Sheets natively, eliminating manual exports. Derrick also includes real-time email validation, integrated AI for scoring and segmentation, and rollover credits, offering more complete enrichment intelligence for strategic outreach campaigns.

Evaboot can handle basic automation tasks and simple lead workflows, but it isn’t a direct replacement for Skrapp if your primary need is contact discovery and email verification. Skrapp excels at fast, browser-based prospecting and one-click data capture from LinkedIn, while Evaboot focuses more on automated lead qualification and workflow automation. For teams already using Derrick, you gain 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring to complement either tool, so Derrick can cover broader prospecting, enrichment, and insights beyond what Evaboot and Skrapp offer together. If your needs are strictly basic automation and quick setup, Evaboot may suffice, but for comprehensive discovery and enrichment at scale, Skrapp plus Derrick provides stronger coverage.