Evaboot Vs Wiza : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Evaboot depends on your specific needs. Evaboot excels at straightforward lead scoring and CRM integration for small to mid-market teams, but Derrick offers distinct advantages if you work primarily in Google Sheets. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits without requiring a credit card for the free tier. If you need native spreadsheet workflows without LinkedIn Sales Navigator costs, Derrick delivers more flexibility and faster implementation than Evaboot's traditional platform approach.

Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets platform requiring no CSV exports or external tools, while Evaboot functions as a no-code workflow automation tool focused on basic enrichment tasks, and Wiza specializes in LinkedIn automation for outreach. Derrick distinguishes itself through integrated AI powered by Claude and ChatGPT, fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and rollover credits with no credit card required for free tier. Unlike Evaboot's limited customization or Wiza's LinkedIn dependency, Derrick enables comprehensive B2B prospecting directly within Sheets, eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator and saving teams significant monthly expenses while maintaining flexibility for variable data enrichment needs.

In terms of pricing, Evaboot and Wiza are generally subscription-based with different value propositions: Evaboot focuses on data enrichment and lead qualification with a pricing tier that scales with data needs, while Wiza charges based on outreach and contact provisioning, often aligning with higher volumes of LinkedIn-driven prospecting. Derrick, by contrast, offers a transparent credits-based model starting with a free tier and progressively larger credit packs (Small: 4,000 credits for $9, Medium: 10,000 for $20, Large: 25,000 for $47.50, XL: 100,000 for $175) with credits rollovers and no credit card required for the free tier. If you prioritize a native Google Sheets workflow, multi-attribute enrichment (50+ fields), AI-powered scoring, and extensive integrations, Derrick provides greater long-term value and budget predictability, potentially making it a more cost-effective option than Evaboot or Wiza for teams aiming to combine data enrichment with scalable prospecting.

Derrick offers flexible pay-as-you-go pricing starting with a free tier of 200 credits at no cost, then scaling to Small at 9€ for 4,000 credits, Medium at 20€ for 10,000 credits, Large at 47.50€ for 25,000 credits, and XL at 175€ for 100,000 credits. Key features include 100% native Google Sheets integration eliminating CSV exports, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and company, real-time email validation for deliverability, integrated AI powered by both Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation, rollover credits monthly, and 3,000+ integrations via Zapier and Make. Unlike competitors requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions, Derrick delivers comprehensive B2B data enrichment directly within your spreadsheet workflow without technical setup.

Short answer: Evaboot cannot fully replace Wiza for lead scoring. Wiza excels at fast LinkedIn-based prospecting and contact verification, but it lacks advanced enrichment and enterprise-grade scoring capabilities. Evaboot offers reliable lead scoring and engagement tracking with strong CRM integrations, yet its enrichment depth is more limited. Derrick complements both by providing 50+ enrichment attributes, AI-powered scoring, and native Google Sheets workflows, offering broader prospect intelligence and scalable automation that goes beyond what Evaboot and Wiza individually deliver.