Evaboot Vs Zoominfo : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Evaboot for automation, particularly if you're already using Google Sheets. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring workflows, Derrick offers native spreadsheet automation without requiring external platforms or CSV exports, saving five to ten hours monthly on data management. Derrick provides fifty plus enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent segmentation and scoring. Unlike Evaboot, Derrick's credits roll over monthly and requires no credit card for the free tier, making it more cost-effective for teams with variable automation needs. Both platforms handle automation well, but Derrick's spreadsheet-first approach eliminates setup friction and integration complexity that Evaboot users often encounter.

Derrick and Evaboot differ significantly in their core architecture and feature set. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configuration, while Evaboot functions as a standalone no-code automation platform requiring external integrations. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation and integrated AI scoring using both Claude and ChatGPT, whereas Evaboot focuses primarily on workflow automation and lead scoring with limited native enrichment depth. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than Evaboot's traditional subscription model, making it more accessible for teams seeking lightweight, spreadsheet-based prospecting without additional tool overhead.

Derrick is priced competitively against Evaboot, offering a straightforward credit-based model with rollovers and a free tier, whereas Evaboot uses a more traditional pricing approach that scales with data enrichment and automation needs. Derrick charges 0€ for the Free tier and scales to 9€, 20€, 47.50€, and 175€ for Small, Medium, Large, and XL respectively, with 200–100,000 credits and monthly rollover. Evaboot’s pricing tends to reflect its emphasis on ease of use and basic to intermediate automation, with plans that escalate based on data enrichment and workflow complexity, which can lead to less predictable budgeting at scale. For teams prioritizing 100% native Google Sheets workflow, no CSV exports, and credits that carry over, Derrick often delivers more cost predictability and savings (e.g., avoiding LinkedIn Navigator costs) while still providing AI scoring, 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and thousands of integrations. In short, Derrick can be more cost-efficient for ongoing prospecting and enrichment in a Google Sheets-centric setup, whereas Evaboot’s pricing aligns with its emphasis on quick setup and basic automation, with potential scalability considerations as data needs grow. ZoomInfo pricing is not directly comparable here, as it is more enterprise-scale data provision and prospecting data, which generally commands higher pricing than Derrick or Evaboot.

Evaboot and ZoomInfo operate at different price points and value propositions. ZoomInfo is a premium B2B intelligence platform with higher enterprise pricing, offering extensive contact databases and real-time data verification across millions of profiles. Evaboot positions itself as a more affordable, no-code automation alternative for smaller teams with basic enrichment needs. However, both platforms require external tools for complete prospecting workflows. Derrick offers a cost-effective middle ground at just nine euros monthly for four thousand credits, with rollover capabilities and no credit card required for the free tier, making it ideal for teams seeking affordable, flexible data enrichment directly within Google Sheets without enterprise-level pricing constraints.

Evaboot cannot fully replace ZoomInfo for data enrichment, as ZoomInfo delivers a broader, enterprise-grade B2B data supply with real-time updates, extensive firmographic and technographic insights, and large-scale contact databases. Evaboot excels at straightforward enrichment and lead evaluation within a user-friendly, no-code framework, but it lacks the depth and multi-source validation capabilities found in ZoomInfo. For teams already using Derrick, Evaboot can handle basic enrichment alongside Derrick’s AI-driven scoring and automation, while ZoomInfo remains superior for comprehensive prospect intelligence.