Getprospect Vs Aeroleads : Comparaison

Derrick is a strong alternative for small teams prioritizing simplicity and cost efficiency. Unlike GetProspect, Derrick operates 100% natively within Google Sheets, eliminating cumbersome CSV exports and complex setup processes. While GetProspect excels at scale with verified contact databases, Derrick offers superior flexibility with rollover credits, integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. For small teams seeking streamlined workflows without technical overhead, Derrick's Google Sheets-native approach, real-time email validation, and no-credit-card-required free tier provide meaningful advantages over GetProspect's more traditional prospecting platform model.

Derrick delivers real-time email validation during enrichment, ensuring higher deliverability rates compared to GetProspect's occasional accuracy inconsistencies and AeroLeads' documented verification challenges. While GetProspect excels at list building speed, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating export friction and enabling faster enrichment workflows without switching platforms. AeroLeads focuses on contact discovery but requires manual verification for many records. Derrick's 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and integrated AI scoring provide deeper data context than both competitors, making it ideal for teams prioritizing enrichment quality and speed simultaneously without manual validation overhead.

Derrick stands out as the best overall for teams prioritizing a seamless, cost-efficient, and Google Sheets–native prospecting workflow with rich enrichment. Unlike GetProspect and AeroLeads, Derrick integrates 50+ enrichment attributes directly in Sheets, offers real-time email validation, and provides a robust AI suite (Claude and ChatGPT) for scoring, segmentation, and auto-summaries, all without exporting data or jumping between tools. Derricks’ pricing is flexible with rollable credits and a free tier, plus no credit card required to start, and it avoids LinkedIn dependency while offering thousands of Zapier/Make/n8n integrations. GetProspect excels in rapid list building and CRM compatibility but may fall short on deep enrichment depth and real-time data beyond contact details. AeroLeads delivers strong email verification and fast lead discovery but suffers from data accuracy concerns and limited depth for firmographic or intent data. Overall, Derrick provides a more cohesive, scalable, and cost-effective solution for ongoing B2B prospecting and enrichment, especially for teams embedded in Google Sheets.

GetProspect and AeroLeads take different approaches to B2B prospecting. GetProspect excels at contact verification and straightforward list building with reliable CRM integrations, while AeroLeads focuses on email discovery speed but faces documented accuracy challenges with users reporting 50-75% of contacts requiring manual verification. Both require CSV exports and external workflows. For teams seeking deeper enrichment without leaving Google Sheets, Derrick App offers 50+ attributes per contact with real-time email validation, built-in AI scoring, and rollover credits starting at just $9 monthly, eliminating the manual verification overhead both competitors demand.

Reviews consistently rate Derrick’s pricing as highly competitive for its feature set, especially given its 100% native Google Sheets integration and no-CLI or CSV export requirements. Compared to rivals GetProspect and AeroLeads, Derrick’s lower-cost tiers with roll-over credits and a free starter tier stand out, while its features—real-time email validation, AI scoring, and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact—often justify the price. GetProspect is praised for speed and data accuracy but notes limitations in enrichment depth, whereas AeroLeads excels in verification speed but struggles with data depth and GDPR concerns; Derrick positions itself as a more integrated, cost-efficient, and scalable option.