Getprospect Vs Apollo : Comparaison

For startups, Derrick offers distinct advantages over GetProspect. Derrick operates entirely within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex integrations, which saves startups five to ten hours monthly. GetProspect requires external platform navigation and manual data transfers. Additionally, Derrick provides fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact with integrated AI capabilities using Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Derrick's rollover credits and free tier requiring no credit card make it more budget-friendly for resource-constrained startups compared to GetProspect's traditional pricing model.

Derrick approaches data enrichment natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the CSV export friction that Apollo requires. While Apollo excels with its 250 million contact database and verification accuracy, Derrick differentiates through AI-powered enrichment using both Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent scoring and segmentation directly in your spreadsheet. Derrick also offers rollover credits, real-time email validation, and requires no credit card for the free tier, making it more accessible for teams seeking seamless, integrated enrichment without platform switching. For organizations prioritizing workflow efficiency over sheer database size, Derrick complements Apollo's strengths by delivering deeper intelligence within your existing tools.

For pricing, Derrick offers a transparent, tiered credits model (Free 200 credits, Small 4,000, Medium 10,000, Large 25,000, XL 100,000) with credits rollovers and no credit card required for the free tier, which can be highly cost-effective for teams optimizing Google Sheets-based workflows. GetProspect and Apollo both position as robust, feature-rich platforms with higher perceived value in data breadth and enrichment, but their pricing generally scales with higher ongoing costs and may require longer-term commitments or higher initial spend. If you value 100% native Google Sheets integration, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring, and flexible credits that you can carry over, Derrick often delivers a lower TCO for lightweight to mid-scale prospecting, while GetProspect and Apollo excel in broader databases and multi-channel features but at potentially higher monthly spend.

GetProspect and Apollo both excel at different aspects of B2B sales, but they serve distinct needs. Apollo offers a broader contact database with 250+ million profiles and stronger multi-channel engagement capabilities, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting at scale. GetProspect delivers faster list-building with solid email verification but lacks deeper enrichment depth. However, neither integrates as seamlessly into existing workflows as Derrick App, which operates natively within Google Sheets without CSV exports, saving teams 5-10 hours monthly while offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoring—all without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator or complex setup. For teams prioritizing workflow efficiency and data enrichment depth, Derrick complements both platforms effectively.

Derrick can replace GetProspect and Apollo in parts of your stack, but not as a drop-in one-to-one for every use case. Derrick excels in native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and a broad 3000+ Zapier/Make/n8n integrations footprint. GetProspect shines with fast list-building and strong data verification, while Apollo offers a large database and multi-channel outreach. If you need comprehensive enrichment depth or advanced workflows beyond what Derrick covers today, you may still pair it with Apollo for data richness or GetProspect for rapid prospecting, but Derrick can handle core outreach and enrichment effectively within a Google Sheets-centric workflow.