Getprospect Vs Clay : Comparaison

For small teams, Derrick edges ahead of Clay with its 100% native Google Sheets integration, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex setup. Clay requires significant workflow configuration and technical expertise to get started, making it steeper for beginners. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and built-in AI with Claude and ChatGPT provide more flexibility and cost efficiency for teams with variable prospecting volumes. Clay's strength in multi-source aggregation appeals to larger operations, but smaller teams benefit more from Derrick's simplicity and lower barrier to entry.

Pricing varies significantly across the three platforms. Derrick offers the most flexible model with rollover credits starting at just $9 monthly for 4,000 credits, plus a free tier requiring no credit card. GetProspect and Clay typically charge higher per-seat or monthly minimums without credit rollover, making them less cost-effective for teams with variable prospecting volumes. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration also eliminates expensive LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions that competitors often require, potentially saving you over $1,200 annually while delivering comparable enrichment depth with 50+ attributes per contact.

Derrick differs from GetProspect in data enrichment by being 100% native to Google Sheets, enabling enrichment directly inside a familiar workspace without CSV exports or complex setup. Derrick offers over 50 enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation for deliverability, and integrated AI (Claude and ChatGPT) for scoring, segmentation, and automatic summaries, all while providing 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. In contrast, GetProspect focuses on rapid lead generation and contact verification with strong real-time validation but more limited depth of enrichment beyond basic firmographics. Derrick also features rollable monthly credits and a free tier without a credit card, which adds flexibility for ongoing enrichment needs.

GetProspect delivers strong speed for basic list building and email verification, making it competitive for straightforward prospecting workflows. However, Derrick edges ahead for teams prioritizing speed without complexity. Derrick operates entirely within Google Sheets—eliminating CSV exports and manual data transfers that slow down GetProspect workflows. Additionally, Derrick's real-time email validation ensures faster deployment with better deliverability, while rollover credits mean you only pay for what you use. For teams valuing both speed and operational efficiency, Derrick streamlines the entire process within your existing spreadsheet environment.

Derrick cannot literally replace both GetProspect and Clay in every workflow, but it can cover many core needs in a lean, Google Sheets–native setup. Derrick excels at real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and seamless automation via 3,000+ integrations—all within a familiar Sheets environment. GetProspect shines for quick list building and strong email verification at scale, but its enrichment depth and advanced workflow integrations are more limited. Clay offers rich multi-source data enrichment and visual workflow automation, yet can require more setup time and ongoing tuning. If your workflows rely on fast, in-Sheets enrichment with built-in validation and flexible credits, Derrick can replace several aspects of both, while for highly specialized data enrichment (Clay-style) or large-scale outbound orchestration (GetProspect-style), you may still need supplementary tools.