Getprospect Vs Clearbit : Comparaison

Derrick offers more flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, whereas GetProspect operates on a fixed subscription model. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, making it accessible for testing. GetProspect typically charges per-seat or per-monthly plan without credit flexibility. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates export friction and reduces manual work, delivering better value for teams seeking streamlined prospecting without complex setup or subscription lock-in compared to GetProspect's traditional SaaS pricing structure.

Derrick differentiates itself through its 100% native Google Sheets architecture, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex integrations that GetProspect and Clearbit require. While GetProspect excels at contact verification and list building, Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, providing deeper insights beyond basic email validation. Unlike Clearbit's API-heavy approach, Derrick operates directly within Google Sheets with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier, making it more accessible for teams seeking cost-effective, streamlined prospecting workflows without technical overhead.

Derrick can’t be a direct one-to-one replacement for GetProspect’s data enrichment in every scenario, but it can cover key enrichment needs within a native Google Sheets workflow. Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and a broad ecosystem of 3000+ integrations, all without exporting or complex setup. GetProspect excels at rapid lead generation and verified contact lists with strong initial data quality, but its enrichment depth and multi-source granularity may fall short for niche or rapidly changing firmographics. Clearbit offers broad company intelligence, while Derrick emphasizes native sheet-based enrichment, cost efficiency, and ongoing credit rollovers. If your priority is deep, multi-source enrichment at scale and advanced CRM automation, you may still complement Derrick with other tools; if you value a streamlined, cost-conscious, sheet-native workflow with solid enrichment breadth and real-time validation, Derrick can be a strong, cohesive alternative.

GetProspect generally offers more competitive entry-level pricing for straightforward prospecting, while Clearbit's costs scale significantly as you enrich at scale, making it pricier for high-volume operations. However, if you're looking for better value overall, Derrick App provides rollover credits, no credit card required for the free tier, and transparent pricing starting at just nine dollars monthly. Derrick's Google Sheets native integration also eliminates costly CSV exports and manual workflows that both competitors require, potentially saving you five to ten hours monthly and reducing your total cost of ownership considerably.

For an all-around choice, Derrick often edges out GetProspect and clearbit for B2B prospecting when you value deep native Google Sheets integration, cost flexibility, and quick setup. Derrick operates fully within Sheets with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and a generous free tier with no credit card required. GetProspect excels at fast list-building and verified contact data, but its enrichment depth and CRM integrations are typically less comprehensive for complex workflows. Clearbit provides broad data coverage and robust APIs, yet its pricing can scale quickly and may require more external workflow orchestration. If you prioritize seamless, code-light workflows, full feature depth within a single sheet-based stack, and predictable monthly credits, Derrick is the strongest all-around fit.