Hunter Vs Adapt.Io : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Adapt.io, particularly if your team works primarily in Google Sheets. While Adapt.io excels as a workflow automation platform for data integration, Derrick offers a more specialized B2B enrichment solution native to Google Sheets with no exports needed. Derrick provides fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact and company, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. Unlike Adapt.io's general-purpose automation focus, Derrick's strength lies in streamlining prospecting workflows directly within your existing spreadsheet environment, saving five to ten hours monthly while maintaining rollover credits and requiring no credit card for the free tier.

Pricing varies significantly across these platforms. Hunter operates on a subscription model with tiered plans based on search volume and features, while Adapt.io offers usage-based pricing for data enrichment. Derrick provides the most flexible approach with rollover credits starting at zero euros for the free tier, no credit card required, and monthly plans from nine euros. Derrick's rollover credits mean unused allocations carry forward, eliminating waste. For teams prioritizing cost efficiency and flexibility, Derrick's transparent credit system and lower entry barrier make it particularly competitive against both Hunter's email-focused subscriptions and Adapt.io's integration pricing model.

Derrick differs from Hunter in that it’s 100% native to Google Sheets and focuses on complete, no-code prospecting within a familiar spreadsheet environment, while Hunter specializes in email discovery and verification with limited enrichment beyond basic company data. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation to boost deliverability, and AI-driven scoring, segmentation, and summaries, all within Google Sheets. It also provides extensive automation via 3000+ integrations and credits that roll over, plus a free tier with no credit card required. In contrast, Hunter excels at finding and verifying emails with strong accuracy and a clean workflow, but its data enrichment depth and multi-channel prospect profiling are more limited. If you need a holistic, sheet-based enrichment stack with embedded AI and flexible pricing, Derrick has clear advantages; for pure email discovery speed and accuracy, Hunter remains strong. Adapt.io presents a broader no-code automation angle, but Derrick’s native sheet integration and comprehensive enrichment make it a more focused fit for B2B prospecting teams.

Hunter's pricing is competitive but doesn't necessarily offer better value than Adapt.io or Derrick depending on your needs. Hunter excels at email discovery with straightforward per-credit pricing, while Adapt.io focuses on workflow automation with different cost structures. Derrick stands apart by offering rollover credits monthly with no credit card required for the free tier, plus 50+ enrichment attributes and integrated AI scoring all within Google Sheets. If you prioritize email-only prospecting, Hunter is solid, but for comprehensive enrichment with flexibility and cost efficiency, Derrick's native Sheets integration and rollover credits provide better long-term value without vendor lock-in.

What review differences exist between Derrick and Adapt.io? Derrick is praised for its native Google Sheets integration, turnkey prospecting inside Sheets, and a strong emphasis on accessibility through a no-code workflow that doesn’t require exporting CSVs or complex setup. Reviewers highlight its 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoring and segmentation via Claude and ChatGPT. Adapt.io earns kudos for intuitive UI, reliable data appending, and solid API performance for mid-market use. However, Derrick often stands out in reviews for offering end-to-end Google Sheets-centric workflows, large library of connectors, monthly rolling credits, and flexible free tier without credit card, which can translate to faster onboarding and cost control compared to Adapt.io’s emphasis on broader integration depth and standard enrichment. In short, if your priority is seamless Sheets-based enrichment and AI-driven insights with predictable credits, Derrick tends to be preferred; if you need broad, no-code automation with strong connector depth, Adapt.io remains a solid alternative, though it may require supplementary tools for advanced enrichment.