Hunter Vs Aeroleads : Comparaison

Derrick works better for most teams than Hunter because it operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating export friction and saving five to ten hours monthly on data management. While Hunter excels at email discovery alone, Derrick enriches fifty plus contact and company attributes directly in your spreadsheet alongside real-time email validation. Derrick's rollover credits, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and zero credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility than Hunter's straightforward email-only approach, making it ideal for teams needing comprehensive enrichment alongside email accuracy.

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing model with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, eliminating waste from unused allocations. Hunter charges per search with higher cumulative costs for teams running frequent campaigns, while AeroLeads uses a credit system but charges for all extractions regardless of data quality, forcing users to repurchase invalid contacts. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, making it accessible for testing. For teams prioritizing cost efficiency and data accuracy, Derrick's transparent pricing combined with real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes delivers better value than competitors requiring external tools or generating unusable data requiring replacement searches.

Derrick and Hunter serve different core needs, so which has better features depends on your priorities. Hunter excels at precise email discovery and verification with a clean, intuitive interface and strong CRM integrations, making it ideal for teams focused on building accurate email lists quickly. Derrick, however, offers a broader feature set tailored to B2B enrichment within Google Sheets: 100% native to Sheets, no CSV exports, real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, built-in AI scoring and segmentation with Claude and ChatGPT, plus extensive automation via 3000+ integrations. If you need deep, multi-attribute enrichment and AI-driven workflows directly in Sheets with cost-efficient credits and no credit card for the free tier, Derrick provides more comprehensive capabilities. For pure email finding and verification speed with straightforward outreach, Hunter remains strong.

Both Hunter and Derrick excel at email discovery, but they serve different needs. Hunter specializes purely in email finding and verification with strong accuracy rates, making it ideal if email is your only requirement. However, Derrick offers broader B2B enrichment with fifty-plus contact and company attributes, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or external platforms. For teams needing comprehensive prospect research beyond email alone, Derrick's all-in-one approach with rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provides greater flexibility and value than Hunter's email-focused solution.

Derrick can replace some functions of Hunter and AeroLeads, but not as a full one-to-one swap for every use case. Derrick excels in deep enrichment within Google Sheets, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and a broad 3000+ integrations ecosystem, all while staying native to Sheets and offering rollable credits and no credit card required on the free tier. Hunter specializes in accurate email discovery and verification, with strong CRM integrations but limited multi-dimensional prospect profiling. AeroLeads provides fast contact discovery and verification with solid data but has notable data accuracy and privacy concerns. If your needs center on rapid, cost-efficient lead sourcing with rich enrichment, Derrick adds value; if you require pristine email finding with minimal enrichment or rely on deep firmographic/intent data in a standalone tool, you’ll likely need additional solutions.