Hunter Vs Expandi : Comparaison

Derrick supports LinkedIn outreach through its native Google Sheets integration, allowing seamless workflow automation without leaving your spreadsheet. While Expandi specializes specifically in LinkedIn automation with personalized messaging sequences, Derrick complements this by enriching your prospect data with 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring directly within Sheets. Expandi excels at scaled connection requests and message workflows, but Derrick eliminates the need for separate data enrichment tools and LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions, saving teams significant time and cost while maintaining data quality throughout your outreach pipeline.

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing structure with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, eliminating waste for teams with variable prospecting needs. Hunter charges per search with no rollover mechanism, while Expandi operates on a fixed monthly subscription model without credit flexibility. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, whereas Hunter and Expandi typically demand payment information upfront. For cost-conscious teams, Derrick's Small plan at $9 monthly with 4,000 credits provides exceptional value compared to Hunter's per-search pricing and Expandi's subscription overhead, especially when combined with savings from eliminating LinkedIn Sales Navigator costs.

Derrick compares to Hunter primarily as a full enrichment and outreach platform versus Hunter’s email finding focus. While Hunter excels at accurate, verifiable email discovery and seamless CRM integrations for targeted outreach, Derrick adds depth with 50+ enrichments per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring, segmentation, and summaries all within Google Sheets. For use cases, Derrick shines in multi-attribute prospect profiling, complex segmentation, and scalable outreach through 3000+ integrations, without requiring LinkedIn or Sales Navigator. If your priority is precise email collection alone, Hunter is strong; if you need richer firmographic context, automated scoring, and a native, CSV-free workflow in Sheets, Derrick provides a more comprehensive solution that complements or surpasses Hunter in broader prospecting and multi-channel planning.

Expandi is primarily a LinkedIn automation platform focused on outreach workflows rather than comprehensive data enrichment. While it excels at scaling connection requests and personalized messaging, it lacks the depth of contact and company data enrichment that Derrick provides. Expandi doesn't verify emails in real-time, offer extensive firmographic attributes, or integrate AI-powered scoring directly into your workflow. For teams needing robust data enrichment with 50+ contact attributes, email validation, and native Google Sheets functionality without manual configuration, Derrick delivers more complete prospect intelligence alongside outreach capabilities.

For SMB teams evaluating Derrick vs Expandi, the review differences lie in scope and data depth. Expandi excels at LinkedIn-driven outreach, with an intuitive campaign builder, strong CRM integrations, and reliable automation for connection requests and messages, but it emphasizes workflow efficiency over deep data enrichment, often yielding variable lead detail and occasional data freshness issues. Derrick, by contrast, offers 100% native Google Sheets prospection, multi-attribute enrichment (50+ fields per contact/company), real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring, segmentation, and summaries, all without requiring LinkedIn or CSV exports. For SMBs needing high-quality contact data, richer firmographic intelligence, and seamless integration into Sheets, Derrick provides clearer long-term prospecting value, while Expandi suits teams prioritizing high-volume LinkedIn outreach and streamlined sequences.