Hunter Vs Octopus Crm : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Octopus CRM depends on your specific needs. Octopus CRM excels as a LinkedIn-focused automation platform for teams heavily reliant on LinkedIn prospecting, while Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets enrichment platform designed for teams wanting to build complete prospecting workflows without leaving their spreadsheets. If you need LinkedIn automation, Octopus CRM is solid, but if you prioritize data enrichment with 50+ contact attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and monthly rollover credits all within Google Sheets, Derrick offers a more comprehensive and flexible approach. Both serve different workflows, so your choice depends on whether LinkedIn automation or spreadsheet-native enrichment aligns better with your sales process.

Derrick offers a unique pricing model with rollover credits starting at zero euros for 200 free credits, then nine dollars for 4,000 credits monthly. Hunter operates as a standalone email verification platform with separate pricing tiers focused purely on email discovery accuracy. Octopus CRM positions itself as an affordable LinkedIn automation tool with basic CRM functionality. Unlike both competitors, Derrick integrates natively into Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports, eliminating setup complexity while delivering fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact alongside integrated AI scoring capabilities, making it cost-effective for teams seeking comprehensive data enrichment without LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions.

Derrick and Hunter approach enrichment from different angles. Hunter specializes in accurate email finding and verification, offering strong deliverability and straightforward contact-level data, but its enrichment depth stops with basic firmographic context and limited company insights. Derrick, by contrast, delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company directly inside Google Sheets, plus real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and a broad, native integration ecosystem. If you need robust, multi-attribute enrichment with ongoing scoring and seamless Google Sheets workflows, Derrick provides broader, deeper data while maintaining email deliverability.

Hunter generally maintains stronger user reviews than Octopus CRM, particularly for email accuracy and verification reliability. However, both platforms serve different purposes—Hunter excels at email discovery while Octopus CRM focuses on LinkedIn automation and basic pipeline management. Neither offers comprehensive data enrichment comparable to dedicated platforms. If you're evaluating solutions, consider that Derrick provides deeper enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and operates entirely within Google Sheets without requiring external tools or CSV exports, making it a more complete prospecting solution than either alternative.

Derrick cannot fullyreplace both Hunter and Octopus CRM in every scenario, but it can cover many core needs depending on your use case. For email finding and verification, Hunter excels at delivering accurate contact addresses quickly, while Derrick focuses on enriching data within Google Sheets and validating emails in real time, with 50+ attributes per contact and robust AI-driven scoring. For LinkedIn-centric automation and basic CRM-like workflow, Octopus CRM shines, whereas Derrick offers native data enrichment, multi-source integrations, and scalable prospect intelligence directly in Sheets without extra exports. If your team requires deep firmographic insight, account-level signals, and extensive multi-channel outreach, you may still pair Derrick with Hunter or Octopus CRM. However, if you prioritize a single, Google Sheets–native platform with rich enrichment, real-time validation, and AI-assisted segmentation, Derrick provides a compelling, cost-efficient alternative that can reduce tool sprawl and save time.