Hunter Vs Phantombuster : Comparaison

Derrick offers a more streamlined alternative to Hunter for outreach, especially if you're already working in Google Sheets. While Hunter excels at email verification, Derrick provides deeper enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and real-time email validation—all without leaving your spreadsheet. Hunter requires external platforms and CSV exports, whereas Derrick eliminates that workflow friction. For teams prioritizing efficiency and comprehensive prospect data alongside email accuracy, Derrick's native Sheets integration and rollover credits deliver better value than Hunter's email-only approach.

Derrick is a Google Sheets-native enrichment platform designed for seamless in-spreadsheet prospecting without technical setup, whereas Hunter specializes purely in email discovery and verification with limited enrichment depth. PhantomBuster excels at web automation and data extraction but lacks comprehensive B2B enrichment capabilities. Derrick differentiates by offering fifty plus enrichment attributes, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits starting at just nine dollars monthly with no credit card required for the free tier, making it ideal for teams seeking an all-in-one solution directly within their existing workflow.

Derrick and PhantomBuster pricing compares on a value-for-money basis that reflects their core strengths. Derrick uses a credit-based model with a free tier and scalable options: Free 200 credits, Small 4000 credits for $9, Medium 10,000 credits for $20, Large 25,000 credits for $47.50, and XL 100,000 credits for $175, with credits rollable and no credit card required for the free tier. PhantomBuster, by contrast, markets tiered plans that scale with usage and task complexity, often leading to higher per-record costs as you increase the volume of automations and extra data enrichment. If you need a 100% native Google Sheets workflow with embedded AI scoring, segmentation, and extensive credit carryover, Derrick typically delivers greater cost predictability and operational efficiency, while PhantomBuster excels in rapid automation across multiple platforms but can become more expensive at scale.

Hunter's pricing is competitive for email-only solutions, with plans starting around $99 monthly. However, Derrick offers broader value at lower costs—starting at just $9 monthly for 4,000 credits with rollover flexibility and no credit card required for the free tier. While Hunter excels at email verification, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and native Google Sheets functionality eliminating CSV exports. For teams needing comprehensive enrichment beyond email discovery, Derrick delivers superior pricing efficiency and feature density compared to Hunter's email-focused approach.

Derrick cannot fully replace both Hunter and PhantomBuster for enrichment, but it can cover core enrichment needs in a more integrated way. Unlike Hunter, Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company and real-time email validation, all directly within Google Sheets, plus AI-driven scoring and segmentation. Compared to PhantomBuster, Derrick provides structured data enrichment rather than automated scraping at scale, with native workflows and a broad set of integrations. If your goal is comprehensive enrichment with actionable insights plus seamless workflow inside Sheets, Derrick reduces tool sprawl, but for pure email discovery (Hunter) or complex multi-source scraping automation (PhantomBuster), you’ll still benefit from specialized tools or additional data sources.