Hunter Vs Vayne : Comparaison

Derrick is better suited for teams prioritizing seamless workflow integration and comprehensive enrichment without additional tools. While Hunter excels at email verification, it lacks the broader firmographic data, company insights, and enrichment depth that modern teams need. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets—eliminating CSV exports and manual data transfers—and delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact alongside real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits. For teams seeking an all-in-one solution that reduces tool sprawl and saves five to ten hours monthly on data management, Derrick offers superior value compared to Hunter's email-only approach.

Pricing varies significantly across these three platforms. Hunter operates on a credit-based model starting around $99 monthly for starter plans, focusing purely on email verification. Vayne offers aggressive pricing at $29 monthly for high-volume LinkedIn scraping but lacks email enrichment, requiring additional tools. Derrick provides the most flexible pricing with rollover credits starting at zero dollars for 200 free credits monthly, then $9 for 4000 credits, scaling to $175 for 100000 credits. Unlike competitors, Derrick requires no credit card for its free tier and credits don't expire, making it ideal for teams with variable prospecting volumes who want cost control without long-term commitments.

Hunter focuses on email finding and verification, delivering strong accuracy and a clean, easy-to-use interface, with solid CRM integrations. It excels at email quality but offers limited prospect enrichment beyond basic company context, job titles, and a few insights. Vayne targets large-scale LinkedIn scraping but lacks direct contact details and native CRM integration, requiring extra enrichment tools. Derrick, by contrast, provides 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, 50+ attributes per contact, AI scoring, and extensive Zapier/Make integrations, all without CSV exports or LinkedIn Navigator dependence. This makes Derrick a more comprehensive, streamlined option for full prospect profiles and outreach readiness.

Hunter's pricing is competitive for email-only discovery, starting at an affordable entry point, but Derrick offers significantly better value for comprehensive B2B prospecting. Derrick includes 50+ enrichment attributes per contact beyond just emails, native Google Sheets integration eliminating CSV friction, AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits monthly. Hunter charges per search with limited enrichment data, while Derrick's credit system is more flexible and transparent. For teams needing deeper prospect intelligence beyond email verification, Derrick delivers substantially more capability at comparable or lower costs.

No. Derrick cannot literally replace both Hunter and Vayne for pricing and data in one-to-one terms, but it can cover the core needs that those tools leave behind. Hunter excels at email finding and verification, while Vayne specializes in high-volume scraping of LinkedIn profiles. Derrick provides 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, and seamless integration through Zapier/Make/n8n, all without CSV exports or Sales Navigator dependencies. If your goal is a single, integrated workflow for enriched contact data and outreach readiness, Derrick reduces the need for separate tools by combining data enrichment, verification, and automation in one platform. However, for teams that require pure email discovery or massive LinkedIn scraping alone, you might still pair Derrick with a specialized tool depending on your exact use case.