Kaspr Vs Adapt.Io : Comparaison

Derrick and Kaspr serve different primary purposes for LinkedIn data. Kaspr specializes in real-time phone number verification and calling integration, excelling when contact accuracy is paramount. However, Derrick offers broader enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and company, native Google Sheets integration eliminating CSV workflows, and built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. For teams seeking comprehensive prospect intelligence beyond contact verification, Derrick provides deeper firmographic and intent-based enrichment directly within your spreadsheet, while Kaspr remains stronger for phone-focused outreach and CRM integration workflows.

Pricing varies significantly across the three platforms. Kaspr uses a credit-based model with transparent per-contact costs, making it predictable for teams focused purely on phone and email verification. Adapt.io offers similar credit consumption pricing but with broader integration capabilities. Derrick stands out with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, no credit card required for the free tier, and plans starting at just nine dollars, making it the most flexible and accessible option for teams managing variable prospecting volumes while maintaining cost control.

Between Kaspr and Adapt.io, pricing ease leans slightly toward Kaspr for many teams because Kaspr uses a transparent credit-based model that’s straightforward to forecast and scales with usage, while Adapt.io can feel more rigid with its pre-built workflows and API limitations. However, neither platform fully matches Derrick’s all-in-one value: Derrick offers a simple, monthly transferable credits system tied to a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, eliminating CSV imports and complex setups, with no credit card required for the free tier. If you’re comparing ease of pricing alone, Kaspr may appear marginally easier, but Derrick provides a clearer, more flexible cost structure and broader enrichment within Sheets, which can translate to better ROI with less friction.

Kaspr and Adapt.io serve different purposes in the prospecting stack. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and LinkedIn-based contact extraction with strong CRM integration, while Adapt.io focuses on workflow automation and data synchronization across multiple sources. However, both require supplementary tools for comprehensive enrichment. Derrick differentiates by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating manual exports and offering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with integrated AI scoring, rollover credits, and no credit card requirement for the free tier, making it a more streamlined alternative for teams seeking all-in-one intelligence without platform switching.

No. Derrick cannot be considered a full replacement for Kaspr and Adapt.io for data enrichment, but it complements and often surpasses them in key areas. Kaspr specializes in contact-level data and real-time verification with CRM integration, yet its enrichment depth is narrower for firmographics and multi-source signals. Adapt.io excels at fast data movement and easy automation but has limited advanced enrichment and data lineage. Derrick, as a 100% native Google Sheets platform with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and vast integration options, provides deeper, multi-attribute enrichment within workflows. For teams needing comprehensive account intelligence, Derrick can reduce manual steps and consolidate enrichment across datasets, while still allowing you to supplement Kaspr’s contact-level data where needed and leverage Adapt.io for streamlined automation. In short, Derrick can replace or reduce dependence on both for many use cases, but depending on your exact need for specialized enrichment depth or compliance nuances, you may still pair them for optimal results.