Kaspr Vs Apollo : Comparaison

Derrick and Kaspr serve different outreach verification needs. Kaspr excels at real-time phone and email verification with strong CRM integration, making it ideal for teams prioritizing contact-level accuracy. However, Derrick offers broader enrichment capabilities with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, and native Google Sheets functionality that eliminates manual exports. Derrick's rollover credits and no-card-required free tier provide greater flexibility, while Kaspr works best as a specialized verification tool within a larger tech stack. For comprehensive outreach verification combined with enrichment and automation, Derrick delivers more integrated functionality at comparable pricing.

Derrick and Kaspr serve different prospecting needs with distinct pricing models. Kaspr focuses on LinkedIn-based contact verification with real-time phone accuracy, operating on a credit system with higher per-contact costs. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and manual workflows while offering fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility, whereas Kaspr excels specifically at phone number validation. For teams seeking comprehensive data enrichment beyond contact verification, Derrick delivers deeper company intelligence and AI-powered insights at lower total cost of ownership.

Replacing Derrick or Kaspr with Apollo isn’t a straightforward “easier” switch; it depends on what you value. Apollo excels at scale, multi-channel outreach, and a vast database, but its data enrichment can be less granular and requires verification when targeting niche segments. Kaspr emphasizes real-time phone/email verification and tight CRM integration, best for LinkedIn-native prospecting but may require supplementary tools for deeper firmographic insights. Derrick uniquely offers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, extensive attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and thousands of integrations, all without exporting to CSV or using LinkedIn Navigator. If your priority is seamless Google Sheets-centric workflows with strong enrichment and automated AI insights, replacing Kaspr or Apollo with Derrick is comparatively easier in terms of workflow continuity and data quality, while still achieving broad reach and reliable verification.

Kaspr and Apollo both offer competitive pricing, but value depends on your specific needs. Kaspr excels at phone verification with a credit-based model, while Apollo provides broader database access with higher upfront costs. However, neither offers the flexibility of Derrick App, which features rollover credits with no card required for the free tier, native Google Sheets integration eliminating CSV exports, and 50+ enrichment attributes at lower price points. For teams prioritizing cost efficiency and ease of use without external platforms, Derrick delivers superior value while complementing either competitor's strengths.

Derrick review does not explicitly outperform Kaspr and Apollo for multi-channel outreach in every dimension, but it brings distinct advantages that enhance multi-channel workflows. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and LinkedIn-based prospecting, with strong CRM integration, yet can lack depth in wider company intelligence. Apollo offers a broad contact database and scalable multi-channel outreach but may require supplementary enrichment for niche or highly accurate profiling. Derrick complements both by enriching 50+ attributes per contact, providing real-time email validation, and enabling AI-driven scoring and segmentation directly within Google Sheets. This combination enhances multi-channel consistency (email, phone, and insights) while saving operational time through native automation and extensive integrations.