Kaspr Vs Clay : Comparaison

Derrick and Kaspr serve different prospecting needs. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and calling integration, making it ideal for phone-first outreach. However, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving significant costs while offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. For teams prioritizing streamlined LinkedIn-based workflows with minimal setup, Derrick provides a more efficient alternative with rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier.

Derrick offers more flexible and transparent pricing compared to Kaspr, with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, eliminating waste from unused allocations. While Kaspr excels at phone verification, Derrick provides broader enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates setup complexity and CSV exports, saving teams 5-10 hours monthly. For budget-conscious teams, Derrick requires no credit card for the free tier and costs significantly less than Kaspr's subscription model while delivering more comprehensive company and contact intelligence without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator.

Derrick can effectively replace Kaspr for contact enrichment, but with key distinctions. Kaspr shines at real-time phone and email verification and seamless CRM integration, especially for LinkedIn-based prospecting, but it has limited multi-dimensional enrichment beyond contact data and can require supplementary tools for deeper firmographic or intent signals. Derrick, by contrast, offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, and vast data capabilities within a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, plus AI-driven scoring and seamless automation across 3000+ integrations. For teams needing deeper, scalable enrichment and end-to-end prospecting inside a familiar sheet-based environment, Derrick provides a more comprehensive, flexible alternative, while Kaspr remains strong for quick contact-level enrichment with strong verification and LinkedIn-native workflows. Clay focuses on data aggregation and automation, but Derrick provides simpler setup, no CSV exports, and roll-over credits, making it a compelling replacement when scale and depth of enrichment are priorities.

Derrick offers a more streamlined and cost-effective approach compared to Kaspr and Clay. While Kaspr excels at phone verification and Clay at workflow automation, Derrick provides comprehensive enrichment with 50+ contact and company attributes directly in Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports. Derrick's pricing is notably competitive, starting at just nine dollars monthly for four thousand credits with full rollover capabilities, plus integrated AI tools using Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation. Unlike competitors, Derrick requires no credit card for the free tier and eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams significant annual costs while delivering faster implementation and deeper company intelligence within your existing workflow.

Kaspr and Clay differ mainly in data scope, flow, and setup effort. Kaspr excels at real-time phone and email verification with LinkedIn-based prospecting and strong CRM integration, but its data enrichment is narrower and depends on public sources, sometimes requiring additional tools for deeper firmographics or intent. Clay offers broader data enrichment across multiple sources and robust workflow automation with strong email validation, yet data freshness and API rate limits can hinder high-velocity, highly precise campaigns. Derrick differentiates with 50+ enrichment attributes native to Google Sheets, real-time email validation, AI scoring, and seamless Zapier/Make integrations, all without complex setups.